Effect of Cutting Conditions on the Stability Lobes for End Milling Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Milling process will be dominated by multiple delays due to the effect of the cutter runout or the pitch angles of the cutter. In this paper, research efforts are focused on the dynamic behavior of milling processes under different cutting condition parameters such as different radial immersions, feed directions, feeds per tooth and helix angles. To improve the prediction accuracy of stability lobe, the combined influences of feed rate and cutter runout on the stability lobes are also taken into account. The basic principle of the method presented in one existing work is applied to examine the asymptotic stability trends for both down milling and up milling. Some new phenomena for certain combinations of cutting parameters are shown and explained in detail. It is found that as cutter runout occurs, feed per tooth, feed direction and cutter helix angle have great effects on the stability lobes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 139-141)

Pages:

748-751

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Altintas: Manufacturing Automation (Cambridge University Press, UK 2000).

Google Scholar

[2] T. Insperger and G. Stepan: International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 61 (2004) No. 1, pp.117-141.

Google Scholar

[3] P.V. Bayly, J.E. Halley, B.P. Mann and M.A. Davies: ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 125 (2003) No. 2, pp.220-225.

Google Scholar

[4] G. Quintana, J. Ciurana and D. Teixidor: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 48 (2008) No. 15, pp.1637-1645.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.07.006

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Altintas, S. Engin and E. Budak: ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 121 (1999) No. 2, pp.173-178.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Marui, S. Ema, M. Hashimoto and Y. Wakasawa: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 38 (1998) Nos. 10-11, pp.1209-1220.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(98)00001-7

Google Scholar

[7] J. Gradisek, M. Kalveram, T. Insperger, K. Weinert, G. Stepan, E. Govekar and I. Grabec: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 45 (2005) Nos. 7-8, pp.769-781.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.11.015

Google Scholar

[8] M.L. Campomanes and Y. Altintas: ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 125 (2003) No. 3, pp.416-422.

Google Scholar

[9] T. Insperger, B.P. Mann, G. Stepan and P.V. Bayly: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 43 (2003) No. 1, pp.25-34.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Turner, D. Merdol, Y. Altintas and K. Ridgway: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 47 (2007) No. 9, pp.1410-1416.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.08.028

Google Scholar

[11] M.X. Zhao and B. Balachandran: International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 38 (2001) Nos. 10-13, pp.2233-2248.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Wan, W.H. Zhang, J.W. Dang and Y. Yang: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 50 (2010) No. 1, pp.29-41.

Google Scholar

[13] W.A. Kline and R.E. DeVor: International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research, Vol. 23 (1983) Nos. 2-3, pp.123-140.

Google Scholar