Different Evaluation Approaches of Confusion Network in Chinese Spoken Classification

Article Preview

Abstract:

As kind of multiple results in speech recognition system, lattice and confusion network are widely applied in spoken document classification and spoken document retrieval. In this paper, the relation between lattice and confusion network is analyzed firstly. Then based on the confusion network by clustering algorithm, different evaluation approaches are applied here to test the performance of confusion network, which include accuracy, complexity and distortion of confusion network. For the experiments on speech recognition system, it can be drawn that compared with 1-best result, confusion network can have higher words accuracy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

174-179

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Mangu L, Brill E, Stolcke A: Computer Speech and Language Vol. 14 (2000) No. 4, pp.373-400.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhang L, Chang J X, Xiang X Z: Topic Indexing of Spoken Documents Based on Optimized N-Best Approach, Proceedings of ICIS, China (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/icicisys.2009.5357691

Google Scholar

[3] Xue J, Zhao Y X: Improved confusion network algorithm and shortest path search from word lattice, Proceedings of ICASSP, Philadelphia, PA 2005, pp.353-356.

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2005.1415248

Google Scholar

[4] Tur G., Wright J, and Gorin A, et al: Improving spoken language understanding using word confusion networks, Proceedings of ICSLP, Denver, Colorado, 2002, pp.1137-1140.

DOI: 10.21437/icslp.2002-374

Google Scholar

[5] Xue J and Zhao Y X: Random forests-based confidence annotation using novel feature from confusion network, Proceedings of ICASSPJ, Toulouse, France 2006, pp.1149-1152.

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2006.1660229

Google Scholar

[6] Bertoldi N and Federico M: A new decoder for spoken language translation based on confusion networks, IEEE ASRU Workshop, Cancun, Mexico, 2005, pp.134-140.

DOI: 10.1109/asru.2005.1566492

Google Scholar

[7] Hillard D and Ostendorf M: Compensation forward posterior estimation bias in confusion networks, Proceedings of ICASSP Toulouse, France, 2006, pp.1153-1156.

Google Scholar

[8] Tur G, Hakkani D and Riccardi G: Extending boosting for call classification using word confusion networks, Proceedings of IEEE International conference on acoustic, Speech, and signal Processing, 2004, pp.1520-6149.

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2004.1326016

Google Scholar

[9] Stolcke A, Konig Y, Weintraub M, Explicit word error minimization in N-best list rescoring, Proceedings of EUROSPEECH, 1997, pp.163-166.

DOI: 10.21437/eurospeech.1997-68

Google Scholar

[10] Wu B, Liu G, Guo J: Research on confusion network algorithm for mandarin large vocabulary continuous speech recognition, Proceedings of ICWAPR, China, 2007: 145-155.

DOI: 10.1109/icwapr.2007.4421593

Google Scholar

[11] Wang H L, Han J Q, Zheng T R: Quality evaluation and optimization of confusion network, Proceedings of ICMIP, (2005).

Google Scholar