The Effect of Calculating Gridding Size on the Formation of Multimode Penetrator

Wei Bing Li; Xiao Ming Wang; Wen Bin Li; Yu Zheng

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.148-149.204

Paper Titles

Modeling and Simulation of Hydrodynamic Pressure in Cutting Zone
p.186

Analysis of Defects of Aluminum Alloys in the Lost Foam Process and Prevention Methods
p.191

Numerical Simulation and Die Optimal Design of a Complex Section Thin-Walled Aluminum Profile Extrusion
p.195

Pb Finite Element Analysis for Profile Wear of Rolling Radial Tire with Camber Angle
p.200

The Effect of Calculating Gridding Size on the Formation of Multimode Penetrator
p.204

New Discrete Particle Swarm Algorithm for Traveling Salesman Problem
p.210

Research on the Prediction Model of Laser Surface Hardening Index on Cylinder Liner Based on RBF
p.215

Improving the Qualified Rate of Coloring Inspection about the Bevel Gear in Centrifugal Ventilator by Applying Six Sigma Methodology
p.219

Experimental Investigation on Determinant of Steel Specimen Transformation Temperature under Air Cooling Conditions
p.223

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 148-149The Effect of Calculating Gridding Size on the...

The Effect of Calculating Gridding Size on the Formation of Multimode Penetrator

Abstract:

Aim at the problem of Ansys/LS-DYNA software simulating in the shaped charge modeling, this paper studies the influence of calculating gridding size on the multimode penetrator forming. It can be found that when the gridding size is 0.028 times the charge caliber or less, the formation of penetrator can be good with the trail result. It obtained the change curve of the model nodes and the calculating time of certain computer with the size of gridding. When the gridding size is from 0.022 to 0.028 times the charge caliber, the model nodes diminish 30.8%, and the calculating time decreases 42.9%. It obtains the effects of calculating gridding size on the multimode penetrator formation parameters, such as velocity and length-diameter ratio. The simulation results were validated through X-ray imaging experimentation. Both results are in good agreement.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 148-149)

Pages:

204-209

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.148-149.204

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2010

Authors:

Wei Bing Li, Xiao Ming Wang, Wen Bin Li, Yu Zheng

Keywords:

Calculating Gridding Size, Explosively Formed Penetrator (EFP), Jetting Projectile Charge (JPC), Node, Numerical Simulation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] A.J. Whelan. Multiple effect warheads for defeat of urban structures and armour. Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on ballistics, New Orleans, Louisiana. 2008. pp.1092-1098.

Google Scholar

[2] G. de la Bat, D. Peters, J deB Maré, et al. Multi-purpose projectile concept to balance the conflicting requirements for peace support operations. Proceedings of the 24th international symposium on ballistics, New Orleans, Louisiana. 2008. pp.1085-1091.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Steinmann, C. Lösch. Multimode warhead technology studies. Proceedings of the 21th international symposium on ballistics, Adelaide, Australia. 2004. p.728–735.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Wu, J.B. Liu, Y.X. Du. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 34(7) (2007). 1147-1162.

Google Scholar

[5] J.F. Molinari. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 38(10) (2002) 921-936.

Google Scholar

[6] C.Z. Gu, X.Y. Wu. J. of Frontiers of Computer Science and Technology. 2(3) (2008). 248-259.

Google Scholar

[7] J. JIN, X.Y. Wu. Computer Aided Engineering. 14(2) (2005). 75-78.

Google Scholar

[8] Ho-Le K. Computer Aided Design. 20(1) (1988). 27-38.

Google Scholar

[9] K.J. Berry. Computers& Structures. 33(4) (1989). 969-976.

Google Scholar

[10] W.B. Li, X.M. Wang, W.B. Li. International Journal of Impact Engineering. 37(4) (2010). 414-424.

Google Scholar