Effect of Silane Concentrations on Mode I Interlaminar Fracture of Woven Silk/Epoxy Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of the project is to study the effect of silane concentrations on the interlaminar fracture toughness, GIC of silk/epoxy composites. Woven silk fibre has been treated with five different silane concentrations and fabricated into a panel with two layers of silk fibre. The processing technique used to prepare the sample is by a vacuum bag in an autoclave. Six sets of panels were fabricated based on different 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane silane concentrations which include one sets of specimens without treatment for comparison. Mode I test based on double cantilever beam specimens (DCB) method has been used over all the specimens. The results of the GIC were plotted and compared with the untreated composites panel. GIC of the composite has been found to increase when the silane concentrations exceeded certain minimum silane contents of 15 ml. During the test, crack propagation is stable and no fibre bridging occurred between both sides of fracture surfaces. All the failure that occurred were at the fibre-matrix interface. The GIC of woven silk/epoxy composites can be enhanced by surface treatment using coupling agent. Surface treatment has affected the properties of the composite panel by increasing the interlaminar fracture toughness by a maximum of 53% at a 5.8vol% silane concentrations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 150-151)

Pages:

1171-1175

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Sgriccia, M.C. Hawley and M. Misra: Compos Part A, 39 (2008), p.632.

Google Scholar

[2] C. Vepari and D.L. Kaplan: Prog Polym Sci, 32 (2007), p.991.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Holland, A.E. Terry, D. Porter and F. Vollrath: Polymer, 48 (2007), p.3388.

Google Scholar

[4] R. C. Wetherhold, M. Corjon and P. K. Das: Compos Sci Technol, 67 (2007), p.2428.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Zulkifli and C.H. Azhari: Advanced Materials Research, 97-101 (2010), p.1697.

Google Scholar

[6] X.N. Huang and D. Hull: Compos Sci Technol, 35 (1989), p.283.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Hug, P. Thevenet, J. Fitoussi, D. Baptiste: Eng Fract Mech, 73 (2006), p.2456.

Google Scholar

[8] W.J. Cantwell, R. Zulkifli: J Mater Sci Lett, 7 (1997), p.509.

Google Scholar

[9] A. Arguelles, J. Vina, A.F. Canteli, M.A. Castrillo and J. Bonhomme: Compos Sci Technol, 68 (2008), p.2325.

Google Scholar

[10] W.D. Bascom, R.J. Bitner, R.J. Moulton and A.R. Siebert: Composites, 11(1980), p.9.

Google Scholar

[11] S.S. Wang, H. Suemasu and N. Zahlan: J Compos Mater, 18(1984), p.574.

Google Scholar

[12] L.A. Carlsson, J.W. Gillespie, R.B. Pipes: Compos Sci Technol, 20 (1986), p.594.

Google Scholar

[13] G. Becht and J.W. Gillespie: Compos Sci Technol, 31 (1988), p.143.

Google Scholar

[14] S.L. Dinaldson: Compos Sci Technol, 32 (1988), p.225.

Google Scholar

[15] R. Zulkifli, L.K. Fatt, C.H. Azhari and J. Sahari: J Mater Process Tech, 128 (2002), p.33.

Google Scholar

[16] P. Davies, B.R.K. Blackman and A.J. Bruner: Appl Compos Mater, 5 (1998), p.345.

Google Scholar

[17] A.B. De Morais and M.F.S.F. De Moura: Eng Fract Mech, 73 (2006), p.2264.

Google Scholar