Effect of Intercritical Quenching on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ultra Low Carbon Heavy Steel Plate

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Effect of intercritical quencing on microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra low carbon heavy steel plate were studied by utilizing SEM, TEM, tensile and impact tests. The specimens were firstly subjected to an annealing treatment at 930 oC followed by quenching to ambient temperature, then were repeatedly annealing at the temperatures being varied in the range of 600~870 oC, and then repeatedly quenched to ambient temperature in cold water. When the intercritical quenching was just slightly above Ac1, the strength and low temperature toughness were remarkably deteriorated attributing to the massive grain and some twins in the bainite islands. However, the more when the annealing temperature increased higher than Ac1 but still below Ac3, the more regions can be austenized, which cause the average of carbon content in the austenized regions to be relatively low. So it was difficult that these austenite regions changed into twin martensites after interctitical quenched. Then the comprehensive properties including low temperature toughness became good again.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 152-153)

Pages:

1371-1376

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Lis, A.K. Lis, C. Kolan: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 162 (2005), p.350.

Google Scholar

[2] Havva K. Zeytin, Ceylan Kubilay, Hüseyin Aydin: Materials Letters Vol. 62 (2008), p.2651.

Google Scholar

[3] Mohammad Reza Akbarpour, A. Ekrami: Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 477 (2008), p.306.

Google Scholar

[4] Shuang Kuang, Yonglin Kang, Hao Yu and Rendong Liu: International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials Vol. 16 (2009), p.159.

Google Scholar

[5] Mohsen Asadi Asadabad, Massoud Goodarzi and Shahram Kheirandish: ISIJ International Vol. 48 (2008), p.1251.

DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.48.1251

Google Scholar

[6] E. Ahmad, T. Manzoor, N. Hussain: Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 508 (2009), p.259.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Dalalli Isfahani, A. Shafyei and H. Sharifi: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures Vol. 32 (2008), p.141.

Google Scholar

[8] Y.J. Chao, J.D. Ward Jr., R.G. Sands: Materials and Design Vol. 28 (2007), p.551.

Google Scholar

[9] R. Bakhtiari, A. Ekrami: Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 525 (2009), p.159.

Google Scholar

[10] S.S.M. Tavares1, P.D. Pedroza1, J.R. Teodósio and T. Gurova: Scripta Materialia, Vol. 40 (1999), p.887.

Google Scholar

[11] M.A. Maleque, Y.M. Poon, H.H. Masjuki: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 153–154 (2004), p.482.

Google Scholar

[12] Aimin Guo, Dehui Zou, Lunxiong Yi: Acta Metallurgica Sinica Vol. 45 (2009), p.390.

Google Scholar

[13] A. García-Junceda, F.G. Caballero, C. Capdevila and C. García de Andrés: Scripta Materialia Vol. 57 (2007), p.89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.03.037

Google Scholar