Freeze-Thaw Durability of Portland Cement Concrete Subjected to Aircraft Deicer

Article Preview

Abstract:

Influence of glycol, which is the main composition of the most frequently used aircraft dicer, on the freeze-thaw durability of Portland cement concrete were investigated. Freeze-thaw durability of Portland cement concrete was tested by accelerated freeze-thaw test. Four kinds of solutions, namely tap water, 3.5% NaCl solution, glycol solutions and a LBR-A type commercial aircraft deicer were employed to be the freezing-thawing mediums. Results show that freeze-thaw durability of concrete exposed to glycol solutions is closely related to the solution concentrations. Failure of concretes exposed to 3.5% glycol solution is similar to that of those exposed 3.5% NaCl solution, which are attributed to serious surface scaling. While damage of concrete exposed to 12.5% and 25% glycol solutions are postponed, and the durability of concrete are increased. Compared with glycol solution, the commercial aircraft deicer demonstrated much more negative effect to concrete freeze-thaw durability, and the degree even exceeds 3.5% NaCl solution. Consequently, the commercial aircraft deicer is not a kind of environmental friendly deicer as usually considered.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 152-153)

Pages:

1856-1861

Citation:

Online since:

October 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rangaraju P.R., Mitigation of ASR in Presence of Pavement Deicing Chemicals, IPRF-01-G-002-04-8, Innovative Pavement Research Foundation Airport Concrete Pavement Technology Program, Skokie, Ill., Apr. (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] Shi X. Impact of Airport Pavement Deicing Products on Aircraft and Airfield Infrastructure[M]. ACRP Synthesis 6. Airport Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C. April 2008. http: /onlinepubs. trb. org/onlinepubs/acrp/ acrp_syn_006. pdf.

DOI: 10.17226/13913

Google Scholar

[3] I.E. Lancaster, Assessment of alternative deicing chemicals to rock salt, Project Report PR/H/ 11 / 93, Transportation Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, UK, (1993).

Google Scholar

[4] SONG Yuxiu, LIU Xuesong. Civil Aviation Science & Technology (in Chinese), 2000, (3): 74-75.

Google Scholar

[5] HU Shuanke. Ningxia Engineering Technology(in Chinese), 2003, 2(2): 177-180.

Google Scholar

[6] ZHAO Xiaolong, Journal of Harbin University of Civil Engineering and Architecture(in Chinese), 2002, 35(5): 81-83.

Google Scholar

[7] Van Dam T.J. Peterson K.R., Smith K.D., et. al. Concrete mixes and pavement construction for aircraft deicing facilities, Innovative Pavement Research Foundation, report # IPRF-01-G-002-03-3, August (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] Van Dam T. J, Peterson K. R, Sutter L. L, Smith K.D. Durability of Concrete Pavements Used for Aircraft Deicing Facilities, Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Paper #08-2231 , Location: Washington DC, USA , 2008. 01. 13~17.

Google Scholar

[9] Michigan Tech Transportation Institute. The Deleterious Chemical Effects of Concentrated Deicing Solutions on Portland Cement Concrete – Executive Summary. SD2002-01-X, TPF-5(042)-X, Houghton, MI, USA, April 2008, pp.1-56.

Google Scholar

[10] ZHAO Hongduo, YAO Zukang, ZHANG Changan, et al. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering(in Chinese), 2004, 4(2): 1-5.

Google Scholar

[11] YU Hongfa, SUN Wei, YAN Lianghui et al. J Chin Ceram Soc(in Chinese), 2004, 32(7): 842-848.

Google Scholar

[12] YANG Quanbing. Journal of Building Materials(in Chinese), 2006, 9(2): 464-467.

Google Scholar