Semantic Enabled 3D Object Retrieval

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the case of traditional 3D shape retrieval systems, the objects retrieved are based mainly on the computation of low-level features that are used to detect so-called regions-of-interest. This paper focuses on obtaining the retrieved objects in a machine understandable and intelligent manner. We explore the different kinds of semantic descriptions for retrieval of 3D shapes. Based on ontology technology, we decompose a 3D objects into meaningful parts semi-automatically. Each part can be regarded as a 3D object, and further be semantically annotated according to ontology vocabulary from the Chinese cultural relics. Three kinds of semantic models such as description semantics of domain knowledge, spatial semantics and scenario semantics, are presented for describing semantic annotations from different viewpoints. These annotated semantics can accurately grasp complete semantic descriptions of 3D shapes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

128-131

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Flickr. http: /www. flickr. com.

Google Scholar

[2] Riya. http: /www. riya. com.

Google Scholar

[3] Princeton Shape Retrieval and Analysis Group. Benchmark. http: /www. cs. princeton. edu/gfx/proj/shape/, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Paquet E, Murching A, Naveen T, Tabatabai A, Rioux M. Description of shape information for 2-D and 3-D objects. Signal Process Image Communication, Vol. 16, (2000), pp.103-122.

DOI: 10.1016/s0923-5965(00)00020-5

Google Scholar

[5] Tangelder JWH, Veltkamp RC. Polyhedral model retrieval using weighted point sets. Int J Image Graphics, Vol. 3(1), (2003), p.209–215.

DOI: 10.1142/s021946780300097x

Google Scholar

[6] Min P, Kazhdan M, Funkhouser T. A comparison of text and shape matching for retrieval of online 3D models. In: Proc. European conference on digital libraries, (2004), pp.209-220.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30230-8_20

Google Scholar

[7] Biao L, Zheng Q. A powerful relevance feedback mechanism for content-based 3D model retrieval. Multimed tools Appl. Vol. 40, (2008), pp.135-150.

DOI: 10.1007/s11042-007-0188-6

Google Scholar

[8] L. George, M. ron, T. Ayellet. Semantic-oriented 3d shape retrieval using relevance feedback. Visual Comput. Vol. 21, (2005), pp.865-875.

DOI: 10.1007/s00371-005-0341-z

Google Scholar

[9] T. Gruber. A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5, (1993), p.199–220.

DOI: 10.1006/knac.1993.1008

Google Scholar

[10] C. Saathoff. Constraint reasoning for region-based image labelling. In 3rd IEE International Conference of Visual Information Engineering, VIE 2006, Special Session on Semantic Multimedia, (2006).

DOI: 10.1049/cp:20060517

Google Scholar

[11] K. Petridis, D. Anastasopoulos, C. Saathoff, N. Timmermann, I. Kompatsiaris, and S. Staab. M-OntoMat-Annotizer: Image annotation. linking ontologies and multimedia lowlevel features. In KES 2006 - 10th Intnl. Conf. on Knowledge Based, Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, (2006).

DOI: 10.1007/11893011_80

Google Scholar

[12] Photostuff. http: /www. mindswap. org/2003/photostuff.

Google Scholar