Finite Element Model Updating Based on Direct Optimization Technique

Article Preview

Abstract:

Setting up of an objective function, update parameters and use of robust optimization algorithm are three crucial steps in FE model updating. In order to calculate the gradient of the objective function, analytic optimization algorithm is not easy to be achieved, while the direct optimization algorithm may achieve the objective function optimization simply by comparing the size of the objective function to move the iteration point. In this paper, the eigenvalues and mode shapes are used as the optimization objective function, the direct optimization algorithm is adopted, an updated finite element model is achieved, and a numerical example is given.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 163-167)

Pages:

2804-2810

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Perera R, Huerta C, Orqui J M. Identification of damage in RC beams using indexes based on local modal stiffness[J]. Construction and Building Materials. 2008, 22(8): 1656-1667.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.06.012

Google Scholar

[2] Fang S E, Perera R, De R G. Damage identification of a reinforced concrete frame by finite element model updating using damage parameterization[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2008, 313(3-5): 544-559.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.11.057

Google Scholar

[3] M. imregun W J V D. FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING USING FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION DATA-DATA-II. CASE STUDY ON A MEDIUM-SIZE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 1995, 9(2): 203-213.

DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1995.0016

Google Scholar

[4] M. imregun W J V D. FINITE ELEMENT MODEL UPDATING USING FREQUENCY RESPONSE FUNCTION DATA-I. THEORY AND INITIAL INVESTIGATION[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 1995, 9(2): 187-202.

DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1995.0015

Google Scholar

[5] Kanev S, Weber F, Verhaegen M. Experimental validation of a finite-element model updating procedure[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration. 2007, 300(1-2): 394-413.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.05.043

Google Scholar

[6] Tu Z, Lu Y. FE model updating using artificial boundary conditions with genetic algorithms[J]. Computers & Structures. 2008, 86(7-8): 714-727.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.07.005

Google Scholar

[7] Jaishi B, Ren W X. Finite element model updating based on eigenvalue and strain energy residuals using multiobjective optimisation technique[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2007, 21(5): 2295-2317.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.09.008

Google Scholar

[8] J.R. Wu, Q.S. Li . Structural parameter identification and damage detection for a steel structure using a two-stage finite element model updating method[J]. 2006, 62(3): 231-239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.07.003

Google Scholar

[9] Ricardo Perera, Antonio Ruiz. A multistage FE updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization[J]. 2008, 22(4): 970-991.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.10.004

Google Scholar

[10] Li Tashan . Optimized computation principle and algorithmic routine design [M]. National University of Defense Technology publishing house, (2001).

Google Scholar