Generic Model for Energy Carbon Emission of Building Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

To establish an analytic model for carbon emission of building lifecycle, based on life cycle theory, a generic model for energy carbon emission of building materials was proposed. With the model, building materials were classified into several categories, such as cement, steel etc. Furthermore, some product from each category, such as PS325 in cement, was selected as a benchmark of this category. And then product coefficient and region coefficient were induced to express the differences in products and regions or manufacturers. With the proposed model, generic models for cement and steel were established. And it is found that energy carbon emission intensity of steel is around 30~40 times than that of cement. Energy carbon emission of PI525 and PO425 are 51% and 34% more than that of PS325, respectively. Carbon emission of large-scale steel and cold rolling strip is the most emitter in steel products.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 168-170)

Pages:

365-368

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. W. Pennington, J. Potting, G. Finnveden et al: Environment International. 2004, 30(5), 721-739.

Google Scholar

[2] M.A. Curran: Encyclopedia of Ecology, 2008, 32(2), 2168-2174.

Google Scholar

[3] Göran Finnveden, Michael Z. Hauschild, Tomas Ekvall et al: Journal of Environmental Management. 2009, 91(1), 1-21.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Talens Peiró, L. Lombardi, G. Villalba Méndez et al: Energy. 2010, 35(2), 889-893.

Google Scholar

[5] Alejandro Josa, Antonio Aguado, Arnaldo Cardim et al: Cement and Concrete Research. 2007, 37(5), 781-788.

Google Scholar

[6] Zhihui Zhang, Xing Wu, Xiaomin Yang et al: Building and Environment. 2006, 41(5), 669-675.

Google Scholar

[7] Zhuguo Li: Building and Environment. 2006, 41(10), 1414-1422.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Verbeeck, H. Hens: Building and Environment. 2010, 45(4), 964-967.

Google Scholar

[9] G. Verbeeck, H. Hens: Building and Environment. 2010, 45(4), 1037-1041.

Google Scholar

[10] Meng Liu: Journal of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering,2008,31(3):114-118(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Catarina Thormark: Building and Environment. 2002, 37(4), 429-435.

Google Scholar

[12] Greg Burgessa and Javier G. Fernández-Velasco: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2007, 32(9), 1225-1234.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. G. Yohanis and B. Norton: Energy. 2002, 27(1), 77-92.

Google Scholar

[14] Renping Wang. Zhenyu Cai: Building and Environment. 2006, 41(5), 687-697.

Google Scholar

[15] T. Y. Chen, J. Burnett and C. K. Chau: Energy. 2001, 26(4), 323-340.

Google Scholar

[16] Ashish Shukla, G.N. Tiwari and M.S. Sodha: Renewable Energy. 2009, 34(3), 755-761.

Google Scholar

[17] Meng Liu, Baizhan Li, Runming Yao: Energy and Buildings. 2010, 42(9), 1482-1490.

Google Scholar

[18] Z. Gong: Master Thesis(In Chinese), Tsinghua University, Beijing, (2004).

Google Scholar

[19] H. Li: Master Thesis(In Chinese), Chongqing University, Chongqing, (1997).

Google Scholar

[20] IPCC. Guideline of Greenhouse Gas Inventory for Nations[R]. (2006).

Google Scholar