An Empirical Study on the Effectiveness of Self-Access Language Learning and its Autonomy Based on Self-Access Center

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the deepening reform of college English teaching in China, many self-access centers(SAC) have been established in universities to promote students’ antonomy and cultivate their leanring ability. Based on the theories of constructivism, humanistic psychology and cognitive psychology, the self-access language learning ( SALL), with its new emphasis on speaking and llistening , is a very good supplement to traditional classroom teaching ,whose focus is only on reading and writing. This paper intends to probe into the effectiveness of students’ SALL in SAC of Wuhan Polytechnic Universtiy through an empirical study. After analyzing the findings qualitatively and quantitatively, the results show that that learners’ autonomy, by and large, can be achieved. SAC and SALL is sure to be very helpful to arouse learners’ learning interest, foster their independence, improve their problem–solvling ability and facilitate their four-skilled abilities.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 171-172)

Pages:

609-612

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Littlemore, Learner autonomy, self-instruction and new tehnologies in language learning: Current theory and practice in higher education in Europe . In A. Chambers and G Davies( eds)ICT and language learning: a European perspective. Lisse: Swets &Zeitllinger B.V. (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] F. Blin, CALL and the developmentof learner autonomy. In R. Debski and M. Lery( eds. ) World CALL : Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning, Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V. (1999) , p.134.

Google Scholar

[3] Gardner, D& Miller, L., Establishing Self-access- From Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (2002), p.58.

Google Scholar