The Characteristic of Petroleum Contaminant Adsorption Materials and the Estimation of Adsorption Attenuation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Based on the experiment in lab and the investigation in study site, we have studied the adsorption of fine sand, medium sand and coarse sand which composes the aquifer. The different type's soil is different to the petroleum adsorption, the adsorptive capacity of fine sand is strongest, the coarse sand adsorption is worst. The adsorptive capacity of Sandy in 33.8% to 46.1%, adsorptive capacity of gravel is 9.2%. Freundlich model is more accurate to explain the sorption of the sands. The adsorption reaction of sand is very rapid, and it often only needs less than a day to reach adsorption reaction balance. The pollution levels are underestimated, and has been underestimated approximately 37.1% to 41.4%, and adsorption attenuation is a main action in study site.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 179-180)

Pages:

197-202

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.H. Wiedemeier, J.T. Wilson, D.H. Kampbell, R. N. Miller, and J.E. Hanson, Technical Protocol for Implementing Intrinsic Remediation with Long-Term Monitoring for Natural Attenuation of Fuel Contamination Dissolved in Groundwater, Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, vol 1, 1999, pp.2-8.

DOI: 10.21236/ada324248

Google Scholar

[2] A.N. Bishop, R.P. Philp, Potential for Amorphous Kerogen Formation via Adsorption of Organic Material at Mineral Surfaces, Energy & Fuels, vol 8, 1994, pp.1494-1497.

DOI: 10.1021/ef00048a040

Google Scholar

[3] Iñigo X. García-Zubiri, Gustavo González-Gaitano. José Ramón Isasi, Sorption models in cyclodextrin polymers: Langmuir, Freundlich, and a dual-mode approach, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol 337, 2009, pp.11-18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.04.071

Google Scholar

[4] Chapelle F. H, Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarboncontaminated ground water: the perspectives of history and hydrology, Ground water, vol 37, 1999, pp.122-132.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00965.x

Google Scholar

[5] Beyer C., Bauer, S. Kolditz O., Uncertainty assessment of contaminant plume length estimates in heterogeneous aquifers, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol 87, 2006, pp.73-95.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2006.04.006

Google Scholar

[6] Kristensen A.H., Henriksen K., Mortensen L., Scow K.M., Moldrup P., Soil physical constraints on intrinsic biodegradation of petroleum vapors in a layered subsurface, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol 87, 2006, pp.73-95.

DOI: 10.2136/vzj2009.0010

Google Scholar

[7] B. Xing, J. Pignatello, B. Gigliotti, Competitive Sorption between Atrazine and Other Organic Compounds in Soils and Model Sorbents, Environ. Sci. Technol., vol 8, 1996, pp.2432-2440.

DOI: 10.1021/es950350z

Google Scholar

[8] B. Xing, and J.J. Pignatello, Increasing isotherm nonlinearity with time for organic compounds in natural organic matter: Implications for sorption mechanisms, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol 15, 1996, p.1282–1288.

DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620150805

Google Scholar

[9] W. J. Koros, D. R. Paul, and G. S. Huvard, Energetics of Gas Sorption in Glassy Polymers, Polymer, vol 20, 1979, pp.956-960.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(79)90192-7

Google Scholar

[10] Waiter J. Weber, Jr., Paul M. McGinley, and Lynn E. Katz, A distributed reactivity model for sorption by soils and sediments, Environ. Sci. &Technol., vol 26, 1992, p.1955–(1962).

DOI: 10.1021/es00034a012

Google Scholar