Effects of Chlorothalonil on Soil Microbial Community of Larix Artificial Forest

Article Preview

Abstract:

The fungicide chlorothalonil is considered to be non-selective and used commonly to control a broad spectrum of plant diseases. Effects of Chlorothalonil on soil microbial community were investigated at recommended rates by Biolog-Eco detecting method. The results showed AWCD values of treatment were all lower than untreatment in three soil layers. At the initial stage, AWCD values of all treatments were lower than the control, and its changing trends were different between surface, upper layers and under layers. The trendency was similar showing increased during two months and decreased till tweleve months in upper and under layer control soil after chlorothalonil application. For upper and under layer treated soil, the trend indicated decreased during two months, then increased at the period of 2-4 months, finally decreased till 12 months. Principle component analysis facilitied for average optical density in different layers of soil microbial community while largely carbon sources had similar loadings before spraying and two months later. The ability of single carbon conversion ratio of soil microbial community obviously improved after chlorothalonil spraying. chlorothalonil residue in soil was determined accompanying with time after chlorothalonil treatment.The fluctuation tendency was all declined accompanying with times after spraying chlorothalonil.In conclusion, chlorothalonil has effects on soil microbial community of Larix artificial forest.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 183-185)

Pages:

1080-1084

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ren TZ. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. Vol. 33(2000), pp.68-75.

Google Scholar

[2] Chen CR, Xu ZH, Hughes JM. Biol Fertil Soils Vol. 36 (2002), p.276–283.

Google Scholar

[3] He Z L. Soils . Vol. 29(1997), p.61–69.

Google Scholar

[4] Sparling GP. Biological indicators of soil health. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, (1997), pp.97-119.

Google Scholar

[5] Kennedy A C, Gewin V L. Soil Science, Vol. 162(1997), p.607–617.

Google Scholar

[6] Sannino F, Gianfreda L. Chemosphere. Vol. 4 (2001), p.417–425.

Google Scholar

[7] Garland, J.L., Mills, A.L. Appl. Environ. Microbial. Vol. 57(1991), p.2351–2359.

Google Scholar

[8] Giller, K.E., Beare, M.H. Appl. Soil Ecol. Vol. 6(1997), p.3–16.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Preston-Mafham, L. Boddy, P.F. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. Vol 42(2004), p.1–14.

Google Scholar

[10] B.P. Degens, J.A. Harris. Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 29(1997), p.1309–1320.

Google Scholar

[11] Garland, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. Vol. 24(1996), p.89–300.

Google Scholar

[12] Katayama A, Isemura H, Kuwatsuka S. Pestic Sci, Vol. 16(1991), p.239–245.

Google Scholar