Effects of Lymantria dispar Feeding and Wounding on Phenyalanine Ammonia-Lyase in Populus simonii × P. nigra

Article Preview

Abstract:

In plants, phenyalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) has been related to defense mechanisms against insect feeding and wounding, and its role was investigated in poplar (Populus simonii × P. nigra) regarding induction by third-instar Lymantria dispar larvae feeding and punching mechanical wounding. The activity and mRNA expression level of PAL was evaluated during time courses in relation to L. dispar feeding and mechanical wounding. The constitutive levels of PAL activity in healthy poplar showed no significant differences during 72 h. L. dispar feeding and mechanical wounding caused different responses of protein and transcript levels of PAL. PAL was obviously induced by L. dispar feeding during a 24-72 h period. For mechanical wounding, activity and mRNA expression level of PAL were not significant induced but were mostly inhibited. The results suggested PAL gene may be significantly related to poplar defense against L. dispar attack.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 183-185)

Pages:

323-327

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I. E Somssich, K. Hahlbrock, Trends Plant Sci. 2(1998) 86.

Google Scholar

[2] M.E. Chaman, S.V. Copaja, V.H. Argandoña, J. Agri. Food Chem. 51 (2003) 2227.

Google Scholar

[3] R.A. Dixon, N.L. Paiva, Plant Cell 7 (1995) 1085.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Karban, I.T. Baldwin, Induced Responses to Herbiory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1997).

Google Scholar

[5] C.P. Constabel, D.R. Bergey, C.A. Ryan, Polyphenol oxidase as a component of the inducible defense response in tomato against herbivores. Phytochemical diversity and redundancy in ecological interactions (eds. J.T. Romeo, J.A. Saunders & P. Barbosa), Plenum Press, New York, 1996, pp.231-252.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1754-6_9

Google Scholar

[6] A.H. Sha, X.H. Lin, J.B. Huang, D.P. Zhang, Chinese J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 21 (2005) 159.

Google Scholar

[7] M.E. Chaman, S.V. Copaja, V.H. Argandoña, J. Agri. Food Chem. 51(2003) 2227.

Google Scholar

[8] D.H. Jones, Phytochemistry 23(1984) 1349.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Hahlbrock, D. Scheel, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40(1989) 347.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Zucker, Plant physiol. 40 (1965)779.

Google Scholar

[11] K.J. Livak, T.D. Schmittgen, Methods 25(2001) 402.

Google Scholar

[12] A. Leyva, J.A. Jarillo, J. Salinas, J.M. Plant Physiol. 108(1995)39.

Google Scholar

[13] V.H. Argandoña, Phytochemistry 35 (1994) 313.

Google Scholar

[14] H.M. Cabrera, V.H. Argandoña, G.E. Zúñiga, L.J. Corcuera, Phytochemistry 40(1995)1083.

Google Scholar

[15] Q.J. Qin, X.W. Gao, Acta Entomologica Sinica 48(2005)125.

Google Scholar

[16] H. Eichenseer, J.L. Bi, G.W. Felton, Entomol. Exp. Appl. 87(1998) 73.

Google Scholar