Electrochemical Degradation of Phenol Using the Oxygen Diffusion Cathode in an Undivided Cell

Article Preview

Abstract:

Electrochemical degradation of phenol was studied in an undivided cell with a Ti/IrO2/RuO2 anode and a carbon/polytetrafluoroethylene (C/PTFE) O2-fed cathode which produced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by the electro-reduction of dissolved oxygen. The effect of current density, supporting electrolyte concentration and initial pH on the removal efficiency of phenol were investigated systematically. Results indicated that the optimal removal efficiency of phenol was achieved under the conditions of current density of 39 mA/cm2 and supporting electrolyte concentration of 0.02 mol/L. The phenol removal efficiency in the neutral condition was higher than that of acidic and basic conditions. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) removal achieved 71.6% and 63.6% for 100 min’s electrolysis, respectively. Benzoquinone, maleic acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid and formic acid were identified as intermediates by HPLC. A general phenol degradation pathway involving all these intermediates was proposed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 183-185)

Pages:

575-579

Citation:

Online since:

January 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z.C. Wu, M.H. Zhou and D.H. Wang. Chemosphere Vol. 48 (2002), p.1089.

Google Scholar

[2] A.M. Yousef and N.S. Abuzaid. Separa. Sci. Technol. Vol. 34 (1999), p.699.

Google Scholar

[3] C. Comninellis and A. Nerini. J. Appl. Electrochem. Vol. 25 (1995), p.23.

Google Scholar

[4] A.A. Gallegos and D. Pletcher. Electrochim. Acta Vol. 44 (1999), p.2483.

Google Scholar

[5] T. Harrington and D. Pletcher. J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 146 (1999), p.2983.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Brillas, R.M. Bastida and E. Liosa. J. Electrochem. Soc. Vol. 142 (1995), p.1733.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.L. Hsiao and K. Nobe. Chem. Eng. Comm. Vol. 126 (1993), p.97.

Google Scholar

[8] Z.M. Qiang, J.H. Chang and C.P. Huang. Water Res. Vol. 36 (2002), p.85.

Google Scholar

[9] S.S. Chou, Y.H. Huang, S.N. Lee, G.H. Huang and C. Huang. Water Res. Vol. 33 (1999), p.751.

Google Scholar

[10] E. Brillas, E. Mur, R. Sauleda, L. Sànchez, J. Peral, X. Domènech and J. Casado. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Vol. 16 (1998), p.31.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-3373(97)00059-3

Google Scholar

[11] H.C.A. Martínez and E. Brillas. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Vol. 87 (2009), p.105.

Google Scholar

[12] H. Wang and J.L. Wang. J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 154 (2008), p.44.

Google Scholar

[13] E. Brillas, C.C. Juan and J. Casado. Water Res. Vol. 34 (2000), p.2253.

Google Scholar

[14] E. Frockedey and A.V. Lierde. Water Res. Vol. 36 (2002), p.4169.

Google Scholar

[15] J.M. Fang, R.C. Sun and D. Salisbury. Polym. Degrad. Stab. Vol. 66 (1999), p.423.

Google Scholar

[16] P. Drogui, S. Elmaleh, M. Rumeau, C. Bernard and A. Rambaud. Water Res. Vol. 35 (2001), p.3235.

Google Scholar

[17] A. Santos and P. Yustos. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. Vol. 39 (2002), p.97.

Google Scholar

[18] A.T. Ricardo, T. Walter, P. Paul and P. Cesar. Chemosphere Vol. 50 (2003), p.97.

Google Scholar