Knowledge Modeling and Semantic Retrieval for Sports Information Based on Ontology

Article Preview

Abstract:

Ontology, with the excellent concept hierarchy and appropriately supporting for logic reasoning, is the basis of knowledge modeling on the Semantic Web and the effective tool for semantic retrieval. This paper pays attention to the sports information management in WWW. Firstly, based on the domain ontology model, we build the sports ontology which has the character of wide-cover and small information granularity. Then this paper present the semantic retrieval system for sports information using SPARQL query language, which realizes the intelligent retrieval at semantic level according to the relations of “synonymy of”, “kind of” and “part of” between sports concepts. For the trend of exploding increase of sports information, this research has practical significance to some extent.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

45-50

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Gauch, J. Chaffee, and A. Pretschner: Ontology-Based Personalized Search and Browsing. Web Intelligence and Agent Systems, Vol. 1, No. 3-4 (2003), pp.219-234.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Castells, M. Fernandez, D. Vallet: An Adaptation of the Vector-space Model for Ontology-based Information Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2007), pp.261-272.

DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2007.22

Google Scholar

[3] J. Li, J. Y. Song, H. Zhong: Ontology-based Query Division and Reformulation for Heterogeneous Information Integration. Journal of Software, Vol. 18, No. 10 (2007), p.2495−2506 (in Chinese).

DOI: 10.1360/jos182495

Google Scholar

[4] J. Arpirez, A. G. Perez, A. Lozano: (ONTO)2 agent : An Ontology-based WWW Broker to Select Ontologies. Proc. of the Workshop on Application of Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, UK, 1998, pp.16-24.

Google Scholar

[5] Ontobroker. http: /ontobroker. aifb. uni-karlsruhe. de.

Google Scholar

[6] SKC. http: /www-db. stanford. edu/SKC.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Studer, Richard Benjamins and Dieter Fensel: Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1-2 (1998), pp.161-197.

DOI: 10.1016/s0169-023x(97)00056-6

Google Scholar

[8] W3C, Resource description framework (RDF): concepts and abstract syntax, in: G. Klyne, J.J. Carroll, B. McBride (Eds. ), W3C Recommendation, 10, February 2004. http: /www. w3. org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Perez, M. Arenas, C. Gutierrez: Semantics and Complexity of SPARQL. In: Cruz IF, Decker S, eds. Proc. of the ISWC 2006, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2006, pp.30-43.

Google Scholar

[10] R. Angles, C. Gutierrez: The Expressive Power of SPARQL. In: Sheth AP, Staab S, Dean M, Paolucci M, Maynard D, Finin TW, Thirunarayan K, eds. Proc. of the ISWC 2008, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008, pp.114-129.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88564-1

Google Scholar

[11] Prud'hommeaux E, Seaborne A, SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C, 20080115, 2008. http: /www. w3. org/TR/rdf-sparql- query.

DOI: 10.1002/9780471650126.dob1092

Google Scholar