Experimental Study on Applying Bentonite for Mango Storage

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, bentonite was applied in mango preservation, and the effects of various treatments methods on fresh-cut mango were studied.The results indicated that mangoes without any treatment easily rotted. The quality indexes of mango such as the weight loss rate, the disease rate and the turning yellow rate tend to increase while the titratable acidity and vitamin C content of mango lose largely. However, the weight loss rate, the disease rate and the turning yellow rate of mango may be reduced when mango were packed in seal bags together with bentonite. Purified bentonite is better than raw bentonite when applied in keeping mango fresh. Burying mango in mass purified bentonite was advisable for mango preservation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 194-196)

Pages:

1864-1868

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rosario M, Robles-Sanchez, Maria A. Rojas-Grau: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 51 (2009), pp.384-390.

Google Scholar

[2] Tassadit Djioua, Florence Charles, Felicie Lopez-Lauri: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 52 (2009), pp.221-226.

Google Scholar

[3] Youngmok Kim, Angela J. Lounds-Singleton, Stephen T. Talcott: Food Chemistry, Vol. 115 (2009), pp.989-993.

Google Scholar

[4] Keryl K. Jacobi, Janet E. Giles: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 12 (1997), pp.285-292.

Google Scholar

[5] S.K. Jha, S. Sethi, M. Srivastav: Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 97 (2010), pp.208-212.

Google Scholar

[6] Youngmok Kim, Jeffrey K. Brecht, Stephen T. Talcott: Food Chemistry, Vol. 105 (2007), pp.1327-1334.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Plotto, J. Bai, J.A. Narciso: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 39 (2006), pp.134-145.

Google Scholar

[8] Keryl K. Jacobi, Elspeth A. MacRae, Suzan E. Hetherington: Scientia Horticulturae, Vol. 72 (1998), pp.215-225.

Google Scholar

[9] John C. Beaulieu, Jeanne M. Lea: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 30 (2003), pp.15-28.

Google Scholar

[10] Vidhu A. Sane, Amita Chourasia, Pravendra Nath: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 38 (2005), pp.223-230.

Google Scholar

[11] T.V. Hymavathi, Vijaya Khader: Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, Vol. 18 (2005), pp.181-192.

Google Scholar

[12] Jacques Joas, Yanis Caro, Mathieu Lechaudel: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 54 (2009), pp.25-31.

Google Scholar

[13] Ildo E. Lederman, Giora Zauberman, Asya Weksler: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 10 (1997), pp.107-112.

Google Scholar

[14] Zhenfeng Li, Ning Wang, G.S. Vijaya Raghavan: Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 91 (2009), pp.319-324.

Google Scholar

[15] H.M. Yashoda, T.N. Prabha, R.N. Tharanathan: Food Chemistry, Vol. 102 (2007), pp.691-698.

DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.06.001

Google Scholar

[16] A.O. Dissa, H. Desmorieux, J. Bathiebo: Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 88 (2008), pp.429-437.

Google Scholar

[17] W.A., Allo, H. H., Murray: Applied Clay Science, Vol. 25(2004), p.237–243.

Google Scholar

[18] Xiaolin Zheng, Shiping Tian, Michael J. Gidley: Postharvest Biology and Technology, Vol. 45 (2007), pp.281-284.

Google Scholar