Microstructure and Properties of Cu-Cr Alloys Prepared by a Shortened Process and a Conventional Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The microstructure and properties of Cu-0.4wt%Cr alloys prepared by a shortened process and a conventional process were investigated by means of optical microscopy (OM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), hardness testing and electrical conductivity measurement. After online hot rolling- quenching and cold rolling with 60% reduction and then aging at 450°C for 30min (process A), and solution treatment - cold rolling with 60% reduction - aging 450°C for 60min (process B), good properties combination of the alloys are obtained, and the hardness and electrical conductivity reach to 156HV, 86.4%IACS and 169HV, 81.1%IACS, respectively, and the shortened process (A) is suitable for commercial copper strip production. Plenty of fine and dispersed precipitates are responsible for the hardness and electrical conductivity improvement of the alloys. The difference of properties between process A and B is resulting form the difference of effective precipitates volume fraction under the various processes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 199-200)

Pages:

1890-1895

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Fink, D. Gentsch, and M. Heimbach: IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science Vol. 31 (2003), p.973.

Google Scholar

[2] N.Y. Tang, D.M.R. Taplin, and G.L. Dunlop: Mater. Sci. Technol. Vol. 1 (1985), p.270.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Zauter and D.V. Kudashov: Precipitation hardened high copper alloys for connector pins made of wire. The 23rd International Conference on Electrical Contacts, Sendai, Japan, June 2006, p.257.

Google Scholar

[4] P. Liu, B.X. Kang, X.G. Cao, J.L. Huang, and H.C. Gu: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 35 (2000), p.1691.

Google Scholar

[5] S. Nagarjuna, K.K. Sharma, I. Sudhkar, and D.S. Sarma: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 313 (2001), p.251.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Nestorovic, D. Markovic, L. Ivanic, and I. Rangelov: Metalurgija vol. 11 (2005), p.309.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Durashevich, V. Cvetkocski, V. Jovanovice: Bull. Mater. Sci. Vol. 25 (2002), p.59.

Google Scholar

[8] S. G Mu, F.A. Guo, Y.Q. Tang, X.M. Cao, and M.T. Tang: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 475 (2008), p.235.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Szablewski and R. Haimann: Mater. Sci. Technol. Vol. 1 (1985), p.1053.

Google Scholar

[10] J.H. Su, Q.M. Dong, P. Liu, H.J. Li, and B.X. Kang. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 392 (2005), p.422.

Google Scholar

[11] W. Bonfield and B.C. Edwards: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 9 (1974), p.415.

Google Scholar

[12] N. Gao, E. Huttunen-Saarivirta, T. Tiainen, and M. Hemmila: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 342 (2003), p.270.

Google Scholar

[13] J.J. Hoyt: Acta Metall. Mater. Vol. 39 (1991), p. (2091).

Google Scholar