A Nonlinear Tolerance Analysis Method Using Worst-Case and Matlab

Article Preview

Abstract:

The tolerance analysis methods are usually used to test the result of product design and assembly; moreover the tolerance analysis also is a fundamental technique in precision design process. So far, there are two kinds of tolerance analysis methods: statistical tolerance analysis and worst-case analysis; they have their own characteristics and drawbacks. In this paper, it presents a nonlinear tolerance analysis method which uses Matlab tool to construct the nonlinear tolerance analysis mathematical formulation and calculate the result of nonlinear tolerance analysis based on the principle of worst-case tolerance analysis. All the processes are dealt with and tested by computer. The engineers only enter some basic parameters through the standardized interface, and then the result can be obtained without artificial intervention. In addition, the accuracy of calculation result meets the production requirement. The system of the nonlinear tolerance analysis is easier for engineers to use.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 201-203)

Pages:

247-252

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Hong YS, Chang T-C: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 40 (2002), pp.2425-2459.

Google Scholar

[2] Jean-Yves Dantan, Ahmed-Jawad Qureshi: Computer-Aided Design, Vol . 41(2009), pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

[3] Kyung MH, Sacks E : Computer Aided Design, Vol. 35 (2003), pp.901-911.

Google Scholar

[4] Swami D Nigam, Joshua U Turner: Computer-Aided Design, Vol. 27(1995), pp.6-15.

Google Scholar

[5] Gao Jinsong, Chase Kenneth W. Magleby Spencer P. Comparison of assembly tolerance analysis by Direct Linearization and modified Monte Carlo simulation method, 21st Annual Design Automation Conference , Vol. 82 (1995), p.353~360.

DOI: 10.1115/detc1995-0047

Google Scholar