Research on New Routing Technology in WDM Network System

Abstract:

In this paper, a new routing design is presented. Interior gateway Protocols (IGPs), particularly Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), uses a simple single metric component, cost, which is based on the bandwidth of the link. Most large IP networks run Interior Gateway Protocols (IGPs) such as Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) or Intermediate System-Intermediate System (IS-IS) that select paths based on static link weights. Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP) is slightly more aware of the link characteristics in that it calculates a metric based on cumulative delay (delay is simply an arbitrary assigned value) and the minimum bandwidth value encountered between the source and destination. Routing technology can better the network operation efficiently.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 204-210)
• Pages: 2180-2183
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.204-210.2180
• Online since: February 2011
• Authors: Ning Zhang, Mao Chang Ge
• Keywords: Network, Routing, System, WDM

References

[1] G. Karagiannis, A. Báder, G. Pongrácz, A. Császár, A. Takács, R. Szabó, and L. Westberg, RMD—a lightweight application of NSIS, in Proc. Networks 2004, (Vienna, Austria), June 2004, p.211–216.

[2] L. Westberg, A. Császár, G. Karagiannis, A. Marquetant, D. Partain, O. Pop, V. Rexhepi, R. Szabó, and A. Takács, Resource management in DiffServ (RMD): A functionality and performance behavior overview, in Proc. PfHSN 2002, (Berlin, Germany), vol. 2334 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Apr. 2002, p.17.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47828-0_2

[3] A. Császár and A. Takács, Comparative performance analysis of RSVP and RMD, in Proc. QoFIS 2003, (Stockholm, Sweden), vol. 2811 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Oct. 2003, p.41–51.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45188-4_5

[4] P. Ji, Z. Ge, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley, A comparison of hard-state and soft-state signalling protocols, in Proc. ACM SigComm 2003, (Karlsruhe, Germany), Aug. 2003, p.251–262.

DOI: 10.1145/863955.863984

[5] E. Ossipov and G. Karlsson, SOS: Sender oriented signaling for a simplified guaranteed service, in Proc. QofIS 2002, (Zurich, Switzerland), Oct. 2002, p.100–114.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45859-x_10

[6] A. Császár, A. Takács, R. Szabó, V. Rexhepi, and G. Karagiannis, Severe congestion handling with resource management in DiffServ on demand, in Proc. Networking 2002, vol. 2345 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, (Pisa, Italy), Springer Verlag, May 2002, p.443.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47906-6_35

[7] D. Vali, S. Paskalis, and A. Kaloxylos, A survey of Internet QoS signaling, IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 6, no. 4, p.32–43, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/comst.2004.5342297

[8] A. Marquetant, O. Pop, R. LSzabó, G. Dinnyés, and Z. Turányi, Novel enhancements to load control—a soft-state, lightweight admission control protocol, in Proc. QofIS 2001, (Coimbra, Portugal), vol. 2156 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, Sept. 2001, p.82.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45412-8_7

[9] G. Iannaccone, C. -N. Chuah, S. Bhattacharyya, and C. Diot, Feasibility of IP restoration in a tier 1 backbone, IEEE Network, vol. 18, p.13–19, Mar. (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/mnet.2004.1276606

[10] A. Császár, A. Takács, and A. Báder, A practical method for the efficient resolution of congestion in an on-path reduced-state signalling environment, in Proc. IWQoS 2005, (Passau, Germany), no. 3552 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, June 2005, p.282.

DOI: 10.1007/11499169_23