Determinition of Optimal Coiling Temperature and Cold Reduction Ratio of Adding P High Strength if Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hot rolled adding P high strength IF steel sheet was used to study the effect of coiling temperature and cold reduction ratio on the microstructures , mechanical properties and textures of experimental steel. The experimental results showed that the recrystallization has finished after cold rolling followed diffrenent cold reduction ratio and coiling temperature was from 550 °C to 600 °C under experimental condition. When the cold reduction ratio was increased, the grain changed fine and uniformity under diffrenent coiling temperature; The yield strength, tensile strength and elongation percentage were approximate 160 MPa, 345 MPa and 35.0 % respectively, under coiling temperature 600 °C and diffrenent cold reduction ratio condition, the plastic strain ratio r value and the strain hardening exponent n value were reached the maximum, respectively, the r value was approximate 1.5, the n value was approximate 0.30. When the coiling temperature was increased, the {111}<110> texture of α skeleton lines was stronger. Therefore, the suggested the optimal coiling temperature is 600 °C, cold reduction ratio was 60 % to 70 %, and it obtains optimally match of high strength and punching property.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

465-469

Citation:

Online since:

February 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Shouhua, Li Jun, et a1. Progress in Rsearch of High Strength IF Steel for Automotive Applications[J]. Shanghai Metals, 2007, 29(5): 66-69.

Google Scholar

[2] Zuo Jun, Chang Jun, Zhang Kaihua, et a1. Rsearch of Batch-annealing Process for Cold Rolled Adding P High Strength IF steel Plate[J].Steel Rolling, 2009, 26(6): 9-11.

Google Scholar

[3] Ma Yanwei, Wang Xianjin, Kong Bingyu, et a1. Production Technology of IF Steel at BaoSteel and Suggestions for Quality Improvement [J].Iron and Steel, 1998, 33(6) : 32-36.

Google Scholar