A Lagrangian FEM Model to Produce Saw-Toothed Macro-Chip and to Study the Depth of Cut Influence on its Formation in Orthogonal Cutting of Ti6Al4V

Article Preview

Abstract:

The foundations of micro-milling are similar to macro-milling but the phenomena it involves are not a simple scaling-down of macro-cutting. The importance of the minimum chip thickness is one of the significant differences between the two processes. The lagrangian FEM model presented in this paper aims to study the depth of cut influence on chip formation of Ti6Al4V in orthogonal cutting. It is firstly used to compare the modelled saw-toothed macro-chip morphology and cutting forces to experimental cutting results from literature. Then a minimum chip thickness prediction is performed by decreasing the depth of cut. Finally this study is the opportunity to highlight the specific features of micro-cutting reported in literature, such as the effective negative rake angle of the tool or the size effect. The model presented brings therefore a numerical contribution to the comprehension of these phenomena.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3-11

Citation:

Online since:

April 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Chae, J., Park, S., Freiheit, T.: Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture, 45 (2006), pp.313-332.

Google Scholar

[2] Weule, H., Hüntrup, V., Trischler, H.: Annals of the CIRP, 50 (2001), pp.61-64.

Google Scholar

[3] Simoneau, A., Ng, E., Elbestawi, M.A.: Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture, 46 (2006), pp.467-481.

Google Scholar

[4] Filiz, S., Conley, C., Wasserman, M., Ozdoganlar, O.: Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture, 47 (2007), pp.1088-1100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.09.024

Google Scholar

[5] Calamaz, M., Coupard, D., Girot, F.: Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture, 48 (2008), pp.275-288.

Google Scholar

[6] Ducobu, F., Filippi, E., Rivière-Lorphèvre, E.: Proceedings of the 12th CIRP Conference on Modeling of Machining Operations, (2009), pp.339-346.

Google Scholar

[7] Ducobu, F., Rivière-Lorphèvre, E., Filippi, E.: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on High Speed Machining, (2010), pp.202-207.

Google Scholar

[8] Ducobu, F., Filippi, E., Rivière-Lorphèvre, E.: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Laser Metrology, CMM and Machine Tool Performance, (2009), pp.327-336.

Google Scholar

[9] Nasr, M., Ng, E.G., Elbestawi, M., Proc. IMechE, Part B: J. Engineering Manufacture, 221 (2007), pp.1387-1400.

Google Scholar

[10] Sun, S., Brandt, M., Dargusch, M.S.: Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacture, 49 (2009), pp.561-568.

Google Scholar

[11] Özel, T., Zeren, E.: Int. J. Machining and Machinability of Materials, 2 (2007), pp.451-468.

Google Scholar

[12] Lesuer, D.R., 2000, Experimental investigations of Material Models for Ti-6Al-4V Titanium and 2024-T3 Aluminum, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

Google Scholar

[13] Bäker, M., Rösler, J., Siemers, C.: Comput. Struct., 80 (2002), pp.495-513.

Google Scholar

[14] Woon, K.S., Rahman, M., Fang, F.Z., Neo, K.S., Liu, K.: J. Materials Processing Technology, 167 (2007), pp.316-337.

Google Scholar

[15] Vogler, M.P., DeVor, R.E., Kapoor, S.G.. J. Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 126 (2004), pp.695-705.

Google Scholar

[16] Jun, M.B.G., DeVor, R.E., Kapoor, S.G.: ASME, 128 (2006), pp.901-912.

Google Scholar

[17] Vogler, M.P., DeVor, R.E., Kapoor, S.G.: J. Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 126 (2004), pp.685-694.

Google Scholar