Hydrophilically Coated Gigaporous Polystyrene Microspheres and their Application in High-Speed Protein Chromatography

Article Preview

Abstract:

Gigaporous poly (styrene-divinylbenzene) (PS) microspheres have been effectively hydrophilized by coating with hydrophobically modified agarose (phenoxyl agarose, Agap). The effect of the phenoxy content on the amount of Agap adsorbed onto the PS surface was examined and various samples of microspheres, differing in surface Agap density, were prepared. After coating, the hydrophilicity of gigaporous PS microspheres was found to be greatly enhanced and the gigaporous character of PS microspheres was well maintained. The modified particles were further coupled with DEAE groups to prepare a DEAE anion exchange medium (DEAE-AP). A column packed with DEAE-AP showed low back pressure and high protein resolution at high flow velocity. Notably, the DEAE-AP column could completely separate a model protein mixture at a flow velocity of 3612 cm/h within 2 min. The results indicate that the gigaporous matrix has considerable advantages for high-speed protein chromatography.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 233-235)

Pages:

1924-1929

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Jungbauer, J. Chromatogr. A, 2005, 1065: 3-12.

Google Scholar

[2] N.B. Afeyan, S.P. Fulton, F.E. Regnier, J. Chromatogr., 1991, 544, 267-279.

Google Scholar

[3] X. Huang, S. Zhang, G.A. Schultz, J. Henion, Anal. Chem., 2002, 74, 2336-2344.

Google Scholar

[4] N.B. Afeyan, F.E. Regnier (Perseptive Biosystems Inc.). U.S. Patent, 5,833,861, 1998.

Google Scholar

[5] N.H. Li, J.R. Benson, N. Kitagawa, US Patent No. 6,100,306, 2000.

Google Scholar

[6] W.Q. Zhou, T.Y. Gu, Z.G. Su, G.H. Ma, Polymer, 2007, 48, 1981-1988.

Google Scholar

[7] M. McCoy, K. Kalghatgi, F.E. Regnier, N.B. Afeyan, J. Chromatogr. A, 1996, 743, 221-229.

Google Scholar

[8] D. Whitney, M. McCoy, N. Gordon, N.B. Afeyan, J. Chromatogr. A, 1998, 807, 165-184.

Google Scholar

[9] C. Fournier, M. Leonard, I. Le Coq-leonard, Langmuir, 1995, 11,2344-2347.

DOI: 10.1021/la00007a004

Google Scholar

[10] O. E. Cassidy, G. Rowley, I. W. Fletcher et al, Int. J. Pharm., 1999, 182: 199-211.

Google Scholar

[11] D.C. Nash, G.E. McCreath, H.A. Chase. J. Chromatogr. A, 1997, 664,53-64.

Google Scholar

[12] G.H. Wang, F.G. Nie, Z.G. Su, Chin. Chem. React. Eng. Technol. 18 (2002) 80.

Google Scholar

[13] G.Y. Sun, Q.H. Shi, Y. Sun, J. Chromatogr. A, 2004, 1061, 159-165.

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Shi, X.Y. Dong, Y. Sun, Chromatographia, 2002, 55, 405-410.

Google Scholar

[15] D.M. Wang, G. Hao, Q.H. Shi, Y. Sun, J. Chromatogr. A, 2007, 1146, 32-40.

Google Scholar