Effect of Gas Injection with Multi-hole Orifices on Bubble Behavior during Metal Refining

Fang Jiang; Guo Guang Cheng; Hai Kuo Yang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.233-235.1940

Paper Titles

Isolation and Performance for Two Strains of Benzo[a]pyrene Degradation
p.1920

Hydrophilically Coated Gigaporous Polystyrene Microspheres and their Application in High-Speed Protein Chromatography
p.1924

Experimental Research on Preventing Root-Stones Loss with Tetrahedron-Like Concrete Penetrating Frames
p.1930

Study on Multi-Void Microstructure of Asymptotic Homogenization for Topology Optimization
p.1935

Effect of Gas Injection with Multi-hole Orifices on Bubble Behavior during Metal Refining
p.1940

Preparation and Characterization of CdTe/SiO₂ Composite
p.1946

The Analysis of Plane Flat Lap Interface End of Orthotropic Bi-Material
p.1950

Preparation and Characterization of Helical Structure ZnS by Solvothermal Method
p.1954

Photodegradation of Toluene by Composite Photocatalysts of Organobentonites and TiO₂: Influences of Carbon Chain Length
p.1958

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 233-235Effect of Gas Injection with Multi-hole Orifices...

Effect of Gas Injection with Multi-hole Orifices on Bubble Behavior during Metal Refining

Abstract:

Cold model experiments have been conducted to make clear the effect of orifices on bubble behavior based on the comparison of 1-hole and 4-hole configurations. It is found that this effect is closely related to the gas flow rate and the orifice configuration. For 1-hole orifices, bubble behavior is influenced by the hole diameter at low gas flow rate. Nevertheless, in the region of high gas flow rate, this effect becomes less obvious. However, bubble behavior is strongly affected even at high gas flow rate when 4-hole orifices are used. It is also shown there exists an optimal distance between holes for 4-hole orifices. Below this value, the hole distance is too small to adequately avoid bubble coalescence in the radial direction. Above this value, little further contribution to avoidance of bubble coalescence can be made, but weight and cost of the orifices will increase.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 233-235)

Pages:

1940-1945

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.233-235.1940

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Fang Jiang, Guo Guang Cheng, Hai Kuo Yang

Keywords:

Bubble, Cold Model, Gas Injection, Metal Refining, Orifice, Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Dipak Mazumdar and Roderick I. L. Guthrie: ISIJ International Vol. 35 (1995), pp.1-20

Google Scholar

[2] Kleimt B., Cappel J., Hoffmann J., Sheng D. J. and Landa S.: Revue de Metallurgie Vol. 100 (2003), pp.583-593

DOI: 10.1051/metal:2003121

Google Scholar

[3] P.E. Anagbo and J.K. Brimacombe: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Vol. 21 (1990), pp.637-48

Google Scholar

[4] Iguchi Manabu and Chihara Tomoyuki: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Vol. 29 (1998), pp.755-761

Google Scholar

[5] Iguchi Manabu, Chihara Tomoyuki, Kuranaga Tomoaki, Ueda Hiroshi, Kodani Shigeru and Morita Zen-ichiro: Tetsu-To-Hagane Vol. 80 (1994), pp.742-747

Google Scholar

[6] Kiyonobu SAKAGUCHI and Kimihisa ITO: ISIJ International, Vol.35 (1995), pp.1348-1353

Google Scholar

[7] D. Guo and G. A. Irons: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, Vol. 31 (2000), pp.1447-1455

Google Scholar

[8] Sano Masamichi, Mori Kazumi and Sato Tetsuro: Tetsu-To-Hagane, Vol.63 (1977), pp.2308-2315

Google Scholar