Study on Swirl Composite Fluidization Mode with Circulating Fluidized Beds for Flue Gas Desulfurization

Article Preview

Abstract:

Circulating Fluidization Bed (CFB) for Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) is widely used. But its desulfurization efficiency is lower than Wet FGD. Its investment is not much lower than Wet FGD. Flow field of CFB for FGD is hard to be uniform. Swirl Composite Fluidization Mode (SCFM) was brought forward compared to Venturi Fluidization Mode (VFM). Experiment and simulation under cold condition was proceeded. From the test, flow field along axis and in cross-sections for SCFM are uniform. Turbulent velocity fluctuation is violent. And particles concentration is high. SCFM has better flow effect than VFM. Uniformity increases with higher superficial velocity and more tangential swirl devices. Recommended tangential swirl devices number is between 3-6. SCFM technology has good foreground.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 233-235)

Pages:

915-919

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gerald H. Newton, Modeling the SO2-slurry droplet Reaction, A IChE Journal, Vol. 36 (1990), pp.1865-1872.

Google Scholar

[2] James K., and Neathery, "Model for flue gas desulfurization in a circulating dry scrubber", A IChE Journal, Vol. 42 (1996), pp.259-268.

DOI: 10.1002/aic.690420123

Google Scholar

[3] J. Yerushalmi, and N. T.Cankurt, Further studies of the regimes of fluidization, Powder Teehnol., Vol.24 (1979), pp.187-205.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(79)87036-9

Google Scholar

[4] Bai D., Y. Jin, Z.-Q. Yu., and J.-X. Zhu, The axial distribution of the Cross-sectionally Averaged Voidage in Fast Fluidized Beds, Powder Technol., vol. 71 (1992), pp.51-58.

DOI: 10.1016/0032-5910(92)88003-z

Google Scholar

[5] Patridge, G.P., Mathematical model of sulfur dioxide absorption into a calcium hydroxide slurry in a spray dryer, Spring National Meeting AICHE, Houstion, TX, (1989).

Google Scholar

[6] Jozewicz, W. G. T. Rochelle, Modeling of SO2 removal by spray dryers, Proceedings: First Pittsburgh coal conference, (1984), p.663.

Google Scholar

[7] Hao Xiao-wen, Study on the Composite Fluidization of Swirl-once Through Flows and Uniformity in the CFB-FGD, ph. d. dissertation, Shandong University, 2007. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[8] Hao Xiao-wen, Ma Chun-yuan, Ma Hong-liang, Gas-solid Flow on Composite Fluidization of Swirl-once Through Flow in CFB-FGD, Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology. vol. 42 (2010), pp.1121-1125. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[9] Qin Yu-kun, Wang Lei, Li Zheng-qi, Song Zi-qin, Hao Jin-bo, and Wu Shao-hua, Effect of Lean Primary Air Outlet Angle on Characteristics of Gas Particle Two Phase Flow of the Radial Bias Combustion Swirl Burner, Proceeding of Csee. Vol. 20 (2000), pp.56-60. In Chinese.

Google Scholar

[10] Yunyi Liu. Kunio Kato, Process analysis of semidry desulfurization process in power-particle spouted bed, chem. Eng., Vol. 33 (2000), pp.223-231.

DOI: 10.1252/jcej.33.223

Google Scholar