Differences in Fiber Properties and Basic Wood Density in Triploid Hybrids of Populus Tomentosa

Article Preview

Abstract:

In forest breeding programs, growth has typically been used as a selection trait of prime importance in Populus tomentosa, whereas less attention has been given to fiber characteristics and basic wood density. Given this context, we investigated phenotypic relationships between different fiber properties, growth and basic wood density traits in nine triploid clones and one diploid clone based on a clonal trial established in 2004 in northern China. We found that fiber width showed, on average (1.4%), the lowest phenotypic variation followed by fiber length (2.2%), coarseness (5.3%). Basic wood density showed, on average (1.9%) phenotypic variation. All phenotypic correlations between fiber properties were positive ( p<0.05), ranging from moderate to strong, suggesting that selection for one trait could simultaneously affect other traits. Phenotypic correlations, on average, were quite weak but positive between growth and fiber properties and slightly negative between basic wood density and different fiber properties ( p<0.05). Individually, some of the triploid clones showed negative correlation between growth traits and fiber length. As a result, selection for fiber properties alone could reduce overall stem volume and would not directly indicate basic wood density traits and vice versa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 236-238)

Pages:

1442-1452

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zobel BJ, van Buijtenen JP. Wood variation, its causes and control. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1989)

Google Scholar

[2] Ekenstedt F, Grahn T, Hedenberg ö, Lundqvist S.-O, Arlinger J, Wilhelmsson L. Variations in fiber dimensions of Norway spruce and Scots pine. STFI Rep. PUB13. Swedish Pulp and Paper Research Institute, Stockholm, Sweden (2003)

Google Scholar

[3] Karlsson H. Fibre guide—fibre analysis and process applications in the pulp and paper industry. A handbook. AB Lorentzen Wettre, Kista, Sweden (2006)

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang S, Simpson D, Morgenstern EK. Wood fiber Sci. 28:91-99(1996)

Google Scholar

[5] Rozenberg P, Cahalan C. Silvae Genet. 46:270-279(1997)

Google Scholar

[6] Hylen G. Can. J. For. Res. 29:135-143(1999)

Google Scholar

[7] Jiaojun Zhu, Fengqi Jiang, Qiyun Zeng. SCIENTIA SILVAE SINICAE 30(1):50-56(1994) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Hannrup B, Wilhelmsson L, Danell ö. Silvae Genet. 47:214-219(1998)

Google Scholar

[9] Hannrup B, Danell ö, Ekberg I, Moëll M. Wood Fiber Sci. 33:173-181(2001)

Google Scholar

[10] Zamudio F, Baettyg r, Vergara A, Guerra F, Rozenberg P. Ann. For. Sci. 59:541-549(2002)

Google Scholar

[11] Zhang S, Morgenstern EK. Wood Sci. Technol. 30:63-75(1995)

Google Scholar

[12] Zhiti Zhu, Huibin Lin, Xiangyang Kang. SCIENTIA SILVAE SINICAE 31(6):499-505 (1995) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] Zhiti Zhu, Xiangyang Kang, Zhiyi Zhang. SCIENTIA SILVAE SINICAE 34(4):22-31(1998) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] Zhiti Zhu Genetic improvement of Populus tomentosa. Chinese Forestry Press, Beijing (2006) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] Lindner S. Responses to water and nutrients in coniferous ecosystems. In Potential and limitations of ecosystem analyses. Edited by E.-D. Schulze and H. Zwölfer. Ecol. Stud. 61. Springer, Berlin. Pp. 180-202(1987)

Google Scholar

[16] Kang YK, Zhang SY, Mansfield SD. Holzforschung 58: 455-463 (2004)

Google Scholar

[17] Hermen M, Dutilleul P, Avella-Shaw T. Wood Fiber Sci. 30:6-17 (1998)

Google Scholar

[18] Jaakkola T, Mäkinen H, Sarén MP, Saranpää P.Can. J. For. Res. 29:135-143(2005)

Google Scholar

[19] Olesen PO. For. Tree Improv. 12:1-21(1977)

Google Scholar

[20] Junwen Pu, Junlong Song, Chunli Yao. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 24(2):62-66 (2002) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[201] Loo JA, Tauder CG, van Buijtenen JP. Can. J. For. Res. 14:822-825 (1984)

Google Scholar

[22] Keller R. Ann. For. Sci. 30:31-62 (1973)

Google Scholar

[23] Goggans JF. The correlation, variation and inheritance of wood properties in loblolly pine. Tech. Rep. 14. School of Forestry Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C. (1962)

Google Scholar

[24] Smith DM. Microscopic methods for determining cross sectional cell dimensions. U.S. For. Serv. Res. Pap. FPL-79 (1967)

Google Scholar

[25] Barnes RD, Gibson G, Bardey MA. Silvicultura 8 Sáo Pedro,Brazil. pp.35-43(1983)

Google Scholar

[26] Smith D M. Maximum moisture content method for determining specific gravity of small wood samples. For Pro Lab Rep , No. 2014(1954)

Google Scholar

[27] Wan Song, Zhiyi Zhang, Jiuru Xu. SCIENTIA SILVAE SINICAE 36(sp. 1): 125-130 (2000) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[28] Xinting Xing, Zhiyi Zhang. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 22(6): 16-20 (2000) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[29] Mäkinen H, Saranpää P, Linder S. Holzforschung 56:449-460 (2002a)

Google Scholar

[30] Zubizarreta Gerendiain A, Peltola H, Pulkkinen P, Jaatinen R, Pappinen A. Can. J. For. Res.38: 1071-1082(2008)

DOI: 10.1139/x07-220

Google Scholar

[31] Pot, D., Chantre, G., Rozenberg, P., Rodrigues, J.C., Jones, G.L., Pereira, H., Hannrup, B., Cahalan, C., and Plomion, C. Ann. For. Sci. 59:563-575( 2002)

DOI: 10.1051/forest:2002042

Google Scholar

[32] King JN, Cartwright C, Hatton J, Yanchuck AD. Can. J. For. Res. 28:863-870 (1998)

Google Scholar

[33] Heifeng Xie, Dialiang Chen, Fuxian Song. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology 1: 1-5 (1996) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[34] Zaikang Tong, Yongping Zheng, Shiyuan Luo, Huiping Yang, Hongzheng Shi. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College18(1):21-25 (2001) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[35] Hannrup, B., Calahan, C., Chantre, G., Grabner, M., Kalrlsson, B., Le Bayon, I., Lloyd Jones, G., Müller, U., Pereira, H., Rodriques, J.C., Rosner, S., Rozenberg, P., Wilhelmsson, L, and Wimmer, R. Scand. J. For. Res. 19:14-29 (2004)

DOI: 10.1080/02827580310019536

Google Scholar

[36] Hannrup, B., Ekberg, I., and Persson, A. Sand. J. For. Res. 15: 161-170 (2000)

Google Scholar

[37] Dutilleul P, Herman M, Avella-Shaw T. Can. J. For. Res. 28:56-68 (1998)

Google Scholar

[38] Qinjun Huang, Xiaohua Su. Forest Research 16(2): 141-145 (2003) (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[39] Bergqvist G, Bergsten U, Ahlqvist B. Can. J. For. Res. 30:487-494 (2000)

Google Scholar

[40] Mäkinen H, Saranpää P, Linder S. Can. J. For. Res.32: 185-194 (2002b)

Google Scholar

[41] Zobel BJ, McElwee RL, Browne C. Interrelationships of wood properties of loblolly pine. Sixth South Forest Conference, Tree Improvement, Gainesville, Florida pp.142-162 (1961)

Google Scholar

[42] Karlsson B, Wellendorf H, Roulund H, Werner M. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 1826-1836(2001)

Google Scholar

[43] Persson B, Persson A. Silvae Genet. 2-3:94-101(1997)

Google Scholar