The Influence Research of Cu2+ on CuXFe1-XO•Fe2O3 Magnetic Fluids

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to increase the magnetic fluids in target-based cancer treatment, the Cu2+ has been studied in this study. The Fe3O4 and Cu0.1Fe0.9O•Fe2O3 magnetic nanoparticles were prepared by ultrasonic emulsion method, and then disperse them into water with sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS) as surfactants to make magnetic fluids. The cubic inverse spinel structure of Fe3O4 and Cu0.1Fe0.9O•Fe2O3 nanoparticles were analyzed by X-ray diffraction technique (XRD).The saturation magnetization of Fe3O4 and Cu0.1Fe0.9O•Fe2O3 were 79.55 emu•g-1 and 75.90 emu•g-1 by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The morphologies of nanoparticles were observed by transmission electron microscope (TEM). The particle size was uniform 10-20 nm, and their shape was approximately spherical. The Cu0.1Fe0.9O•Fe2O3 magnetic particle functional group and the surface of particle coated with SDBS have been detected by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR). The magnetic fluids with a high saturation magnetization and stability have been prepared successfully in this study.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 236-238)

Pages:

2004-2007

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Kim, J. Jung, J. Lee, K. Na, S. Park and J. Hyun: Colloids Surf., B Vol. 76 (2010), p.236

Google Scholar

[2] J. Qian and Z. Yang: J China Univ Mining & Technol. Vol. 18 (2008), p.634

Google Scholar

[3] X. Li, Z. Liu, H. An, X. Zhang and R. Qi: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 201 (2007), p.5371

Google Scholar

[4] C. Shen, W. Huang, G. Ma and X. Wang: Surf. Coat. Technol. Vol. 204 (2009), p.433

Google Scholar

[5] B. Chai, W. Zhang and D. Li: Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 27 (2004), p.159 (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] M.S. Walker and A.L. Devernoe: Int. J. Miner. Process. Vol. 31 (1991), p.195

Google Scholar

[7] A. Jordan, R. Scholz, K. Maier-Hauff, M. Johannsen, P. Wust, J. Nadobny, H. Schirra, H. Schmidt, S. Deger, S. Loening, W. Lanksch and R. Felix: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 225 (2001), p.118

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-8853(00)01239-7

Google Scholar

[8] S. Chen, C.L. Chiang and S. Hsieh: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 322 (2010), p.247

Google Scholar

[9] D. Zhao, X. Wang, X. Zeng, Q. Xia and J. Tang: J. Alloys Compd. Vol. 477 (2009), p.739

Google Scholar

[10] A. Jordan, R. Scholz, P. Wust, H. Fähling and R. Felix: J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 201 (1999), p.413

Google Scholar

[11] S. Müller: Nanomedicine Vol. 5 (2009), p.387

Google Scholar

[12] A.S. Lübbe, C. Alexiou and C. Bergemann: J. Surg. Res. Vol. 95 (2001), p.200

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Zhao, Z. Qiu and J. Huang: Chin. J. Chem. Eng. Vol. 16 (2008), p.451

Google Scholar

[14] C.Y. Haw, F. Mohamed, C.H. Chia, S. Radiman, S. Zakaria, N.M. Huang and H.N. Lim: Ceram. Int. Vol. 36 (2010), p.1417

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Huang, J.H. Kim, S.I. Park, H. Shao and C.O. Kim: J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 93 (2003), p.8444

Google Scholar