Ultimate Load Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beam with Finite Element

Article Preview

Abstract:

A efficient 3D beam element based on the distributed nonlinearity theory is proposed for nonlinear analysis of reinforcement concrete structures. The sections consist of reinforcing steel and concrete in this formulation and the section stiffness matrices are calculated through the integration of stress-strain relations of concrete and the accumulation of reinforcing steel effect. The force-based formulation is adopted in the evaluation of the element stiffness matrix and the element state determination. The improved Kent-Park model is adopt for the stress-strain relation of concrete, and uniaxial stress–strain relationships proposed by Mander is introduced for reinforcing steel. Finally, the ultimate load of a cantilever reinforced concrete beam subjected to a lateral load was analyzed with the proposed formulation to illustrate its accuracy and computational efficiency.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

1340-1345

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Brondum T. Ultimate flexural capacity of cracked polygonal concrete sections,under axial loads and biaxial bending. ACI Concrete Int 1987;84(3):212-215.

DOI: 10.14359/2643

Google Scholar

[2] C.Y. Yan, S.L. Chan, So AKW. Biaxial bending design of arbitrarily shaped reinforced concrete columns. ACI Struct J 1993;90(3):269-278.

DOI: 10.14359/4235

Google Scholar

[3] J.R. Yen. Quasi-Newton method for reinforced concrete column analysis and design. ASCE J Struct. Eng. 1991;117(3):657-666.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1991)117:3(657)

Google Scholar

[4] E. Spacone, F.C. Filippou. F.F. TAUCER. Fiber beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames (Part I ) formulation[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1996, 25(7):711-725.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199607)25:7<711::aid-eqe576>3.0.co;2-9

Google Scholar

[5] E. Spacone, F.C. Filippou. Fiber beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames:(part II) Applications [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 1996, 25:727-742.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199607)25:7<727::aid-eqe577>3.0.co;2-o

Google Scholar

[6] Lingyuan ZHOU,Qiao LI. Nonlinear Beam Element with Meshed Section [J],Journal of SouthWest Jiaotong University,2006,44(6), 690-695

Google Scholar

[7] M. Saatcioglu, S.R. Razvi. Strength and ductility of confined concrete[J]. Journal of Structure Engineering. 1992, 118(6):1590-1607.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1992)118:6(1590)

Google Scholar

[8] R.Park, M.J.N. Priestley, W.D. Gill. Ductility of square confined concrete columns[J]. Journal of Structure Division. ASCE. 1982, 108(4):929-950

DOI: 10.1061/jsdeag.0005933

Google Scholar

[9] J.B. Mander, M.J.N. Priestley. R.Park. Seismic design of bridge piers[R]. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, (1984)

Google Scholar

[10] R.P. Dhakal, K.Maekawak. Path-dependent cyclic stress-strain relationship of reinforcing bar including buckling[J]. Engineering Structures, vol24, 2002:1383-1896

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(02)00080-9

Google Scholar

[11] Lingyuan ZHOU, Research on nonlinear theory and load carrying capacity of cable stayed bridges[D],Southwest Jiaotong University,2007.6

Google Scholar