Slurry Shield Tunnelling in Clayey Soils: Typical Problems and Countermeasures

Article Preview

Abstract:

The distinguishing characteristics of clay are high cohesion and low permeability. For slurry shield tunnelling in clayey soils, favorable aspects are that slurry cake with low permeability can be established more easily and effectively at the excavation face thanks to clay’s high cohesion, which is advantageous for stability of excavation face, and long stand-up time of clay offers enough time for backfilling of the tail void before collapse of surrounding soils, thus lessening ground volume loss. However, some typical problems are encountered due to clay’s high cohesion and low permeability. One primary problem is the clogging of slurry pipeline, once in case of which, slurry pressure will fluctuate severely, thus inducing unstable condition at the excavation face. In extreme cases, the pipeline bursts and soils at the excavation face collapse towards the cutterhead for immediate drop of slurry pressure. Another common problem is clay’s adhesion to the cutterhead, which weakens the excavation efficiency of cutterhead and limits advance rate of the shield machine. Tunnelling will inevitably disturb surrounding soils and excess pore water pressure occurs. In clayey soils, due to clay’s low permeability, it usually takes quite a long time for the excess pore water pressure to disperse completely. The consolidation settlements associated with pore water dispersing account for a large percentage of the total settlements. Accumulated ground settlements threaten structures and pipelines nearby. For these problems encountered during slurry shield tunnelling in clayey soils, both preventive and counter measures are put forward in detail in this study. The proposed measures can be used as a reference to avoid, mitigate and deal with problems encountered during slurry shield tunnelling in clayey soils.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

2944-2947

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Vittorio Guglielmetti, Piergiorgio Grasso, Ashraf Mahtab et al. Mechanized tunneling in urban areas-design methodology and construction control [M]. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, 2008:80-300.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203938515

Google Scholar

[2] Karl Terzaghi, Ralph B.Peck, Gholamreza Mesri. Soil mechanics in engineering practice[M].John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, the United States of America, 1996:1-20.

Google Scholar

[3] Alejandro J.Abrams. Earth Pressure Balance (EPB) Tunneling Inducing Settlements in the Tren Urbano Project, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico [D].For the Degree of Master of Engineering in Civil and Environmental Engineeing at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, June, 2007:1-24.

Google Scholar

[4] Tadashi Sugiyama, Toshituki Hagiwara, Toshi Nomoto,et al. Observation of ground movements during tunnel construction by slurry shield method at the Docklands light railway Lewisham extension-east London [J]. Soils and foundations,1999,39(3):99-112.

DOI: 10.3208/sandf.39.3_99

Google Scholar

[5] R. J. Mair. Tunnelling and geotechnics: new horizons [J]. Geotechnique 58,2008,NO. 9, 695-736.

Google Scholar

[6] J.N. Shirlaw. Observed and calculated pore pressure and deformations induced by an earth balance shield: discussion[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1995, 32(1):181-189.

DOI: 10.1139/t95-017

Google Scholar

[7] Mair, R.J. & Taylor R.N.(1997) Bored tunnelling in the urban environment: State-of –the art report and theme lecture. Procedings of the 14th Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Hamburg 4,2353-2385.

Google Scholar