Risk Control in the Deep Excavations with the Application of the Observational Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The uncertainty of the ground, in which a deep excavation to be conducted, is always inherent. The risk control of the excavation is therefore necessary. Based on the principle features of a deep excavation, a general process of risk control is presented in terms of design and construction, with the application of the observational method. To avoid the conflicts of the involved groups’ interests, a close co-operation between the groups in a well planned procedure is vital to the success of the risk control, especially to the case with rapid deterioration stages included.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

3403-3410

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Flyvbjerg, N. Bruzelius and W. Rothengatter: Megaprojects and Risks: An Anatomy of Ambition, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (2003).

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781107050891

Google Scholar

[2] GEO: Catalogue of Notable Tunnel Failure Case Histories (up to December 2008), Hong Kong (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] R. Peck: Geotechnique, Vol.19 (1969), p.171

Google Scholar

[4] D. Nicholson, C. M. Tse and C. Penny: The Observational Method in Ground Engineering: Principles and Applications, CIRIA Report No. 185, CIRIA, London (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] C.R.I. Clayton: Managing Geotechnical Risk - Improving Productivity in UK Building and Construction, Institution of Civil Engineers, London (2001).

DOI: 10.1680/mgr.29675

Google Scholar

[6] GEO: Geotechnical Risk Management for Tunnel Works, Hong Kong (2009).

Google Scholar

[7] S.D. Eskesen, P. Tengborg, J. Kampmann and T.H. Veicherts: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 19 (2004), p.217

DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2004.01.001

Google Scholar

[8] E. Hoek: the Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology, Vol.32 (1999), p.1

Google Scholar

[9] D. Patel, D. Nicholson, N. Huybrechts and J. Maertens: Proc. 14th Eur. Conf. Soil Mech. & Geotech. Eng., Madrid (2007), p.371

Google Scholar

[10] M. B. Jaksa, J. S. Goldsworthy, G. A. Fenton, W. S. Kaggwa, D. V. Griffiths, Y. L. Kuo and H. G. Poulos: Geotechnique, Vol.55 (2005),p.109

DOI: 10.1680/geot.55.2.109.59531

Google Scholar

[11] G.S. Littlejohn, K.W. Cole and T.W. Mellors: Proc. of the Institution on Engineers, Vol.102 (1994), p.72

Google Scholar

[12] R. Bea: J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 132 (2006), p.631

Google Scholar

[13] G.F. Sowers: J. Geotech. Eng., Vol.119 (1993), p.238

Google Scholar

[14] S.-G. Kim, J.-J. Kim and K.-R. Kim: Proc. of the Construction Research Congress 2005: Broadening Perspectives, San Diego, California, USA (2005).

Google Scholar

[15] R.R. Stoelsnes and R.G. Bea: Risk Management: An International J., Vol.7 (2005), p.19

Google Scholar

[16] N.J. Smith: Managing Risk in Construction Project, Blackwell Science (1998).

Google Scholar

[17] R.J. Essex: Geotechnical Baseline Reports for Construction: Suggested Guidelines, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, USA (2007).

Google Scholar