Analysis of the Relationship between Porous Pavement Thickness and Water Film Quantification

Article Preview

Abstract:

This research mainly uses the image binaryzation to quantify water fog in order to have a better understanding about the water fog degree that drainage pavement reduces and the relationship between drainage pavement thickness and water fog. By observing the water fog that tires splash while raining, the study result shows that the most adequate pavement thickness of drainage pavement is 4cm. The water fog it reduces is double of 2.5cm drainage pavement. The thicker drainage pavement is also considered safer to drivers. About the drainage path, the shorter the faster it can drain off the rainwater and reduces the water fog degree that heavy vehicles splash.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

4139-4146

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.A. Tan, T.F. Fwa, and K.C. Chaui, "Drainage Consideration For Porous Asphalt Surface Course."Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.(CD-ROM)(2004).

Google Scholar

[2] T.F. Fwa, S.A. Tan, and Y.K. Guwe, "Laboratory Evaluation of Clogging Potential of Porous Asphalt Mixtures." Transportation Research Recoard 1681, pp.43-49(1999).

DOI: 10.3141/1681-06

Google Scholar

[3] S.N. Suresha, G. Varghese, and A.U. Ravi, "Characterization of Porous Friction Course Mixes for Different Marshall Compaction Efforts." Construction and Building Materials 23, pp.2887-2893(2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.008

Google Scholar

[4] E. Vivar, and J.E. Haddock, "Hot-Mix Asphalt Permeability and Porosity."Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 76, pp.953-980(2007).

Google Scholar

[5] R. M., Joubert, "Durable open-graded mixes enhance safety and reduce noise." Asphalt Magazine, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.1-2(1992).

Google Scholar

[6] S. Meiarashi, "Research on low noise pavement in Japan." Journal of the Acoustical Society of Japan, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.19-27 (1999).

Google Scholar

[7] T. F. Fwa, Y. S. Choo, and Y. Liu, "Effect of aggregate spacing on skid resistance of asphalt pavement." Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 4, pp.420-426 (2003).

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2003)129:4(420)

Google Scholar

[8] B. Powell, "Construction and performance of Georgia's permeable surface mixes on the 2006 NCAT pavement test track." Transportation Research Board 88rd Annual Meeting(2009).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Gazzi, T. Georgiadis, and V. Vicentini, "Distant contrast measurement through fog and thick haze." Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 35, pp.5143-5149(2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00333-8

Google Scholar

[10] P. Mariusz, G. Ismail, and K.Patrick, "Analysis and modeling of an extremely dense fog even in southern Ontario." Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 1, pp.3-16(2004).

Google Scholar

[11] A. N. Maher, S. Herve, and D. F. Erederique, "Fog attenuation prediction for optical and infrared waves."Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Vol. 43, pp.319-329(2004).

Google Scholar

[12] T. Hagiwara, "Development of visibility assessment methods using digital images under foggycondition." Transportation Research Board 83rd Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.(CD-ROM)(2004).

Google Scholar