Experimental Study on Steel Frames Infilled with Sandwich Composite Panels

Article Preview

Abstract:

A model of full scale one-bay, one storey was tested under low cyclic loading in order to study the hysteretic behavior of steel frames with sandwich composite (SC) panels. According to the failure pattern and damage process of test specimen, seismic behaviors were evaluated. Hysterics loops, skeleton curves, curves of strength degradation, and curves of stiffness degradation, ductility index and viscous damping coefficient were analyzed. Test results show that the failures of panels mainly occurred around the embedded parts, but compared with traditional panels and walls, SC panels exhibit a better integration. The connection between panel and steel frame is vital to the mutual work of the two parts. Finally, seismic design recommendations based on the analysis of ductility index and energy dissipation of the structures are presented.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

499-505

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Polyakov, S.V: On the interaction between masonry filler walls and enclosing frame when loaded in the plane of the wall. Translations in earthquake engineering. Earthquake engineering research institute, San Francisco, 36-42.(1960)

Google Scholar

[2] Polyakov, S.V: Masonry in framed buildings. G.L. Cairns, translator, National lending library for science and technology, Boston Spa, Yorkshire, U.K.(1963)

Google Scholar

[3] M.Papia, L.Cavaleri,M.Fossetti: Infilled frames: developments in the evaluation of the stiffening effects of infills. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 16, No.6:675-693(2003).

DOI: 10.12989/sem.2003.16.6.675

Google Scholar

[4] L.Cavaleri,M.Fossetti,M.Papia: Infilled frames: developments in the evaluation of cyclic behaviour under lateral load. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Vol. 21, No.4:469-494(2005).

DOI: 10.12989/sem.2005.21.4.469

Google Scholar

[5] Xiaotong Peng, Qiang Gu, Chen Lin: Experimental study on steel frame-reinforced concrete infill wall structures with semi-rigid joints. China Civil Engineering Journal. 2008;41(1);64-69. [In Chinese]

Google Scholar

[6] Xiaotong Peng, Qiang Gu, Chen Lin: Hysteretic behavior analysis of steel frame-reinforced concrete infill wall structure with semi-rigid joints. Journal of Building Structures.2009;30(1);48-54. [In Chinese]

DOI: 10.1109/iccsit.2009.5234584

Google Scholar

[7] Wright HD, Gallocher SC: The behaviour of composite walling under construction and service loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research.1995;35(3):257-273.

DOI: 10.1016/0143-974x(94)00051-i

Google Scholar

[8] Ariel Hanaor: Experimental investigation of composite shear panels under cyclic loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research.2005;61(3);345-369.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.09.005

Google Scholar

[9] Gianfranco De Matteis, Raffaele Landolfo: Modelling of lightweight sandwich shear diaphragms for dynamic analyses. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 2000;53(1):33-61.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(99)00038-3

Google Scholar

[10] ATC-24. Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. Redwood City (CA): Applied Technology Council; 1992.

Google Scholar

[11] J.R. Tang: Seismic resistance of joints in reinforced concrete frames. Nanjing (China): Southeast Univ. Press; 1989[In Chinese].

Google Scholar

[12] GB50011-2001. Specification of structural earthquake-resistant design. Bei-jing: China Building Industry Press; 2002 [In Chinese].

Google Scholar