Method of Weight Assignment for Multi-Criterion Based on Grey Interval AHP

Chun Yan Xia; Yan Jie Liu; Dong Mei Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.5285

Paper Titles

Analysis of the Disaster Prevention Marking System for Urban Public Building
p.5263

Simplified Method for Horizontal Displacement Calculation of Frames at Elevated Temperature
p.5269

Environment Impact Comparison of Different Structure System Based on Life Cycle Assessment Methodology
p.5275

Heavy Metal Pollution of River Sludge in Taiyuan
p.5280

Method of Weight Assignment for Multi-Criterion Based on Grey Interval AHP
p.5285

Global Climate Change Opportunity as Well as Challenge to Architecture
p.5289

FEM Analysis on Tensile Forces of Liner System with a Change of Slope Angle
p.5293

Utilization of Industrial Wastes for Soil Stabilizer Preparation and Technical-Economical-Environmental Analysis
p.5298

Study on Synergetic Catalytic Ozonation of Nitrobenzene in Nebulizing Systems
p.5304

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 243-249Method of Weight Assignment for Multi-Criterion...

Method of Weight Assignment for Multi-Criterion Based on Grey Interval AHP

Abstract:

According to the problem of weight assignment for multi-criterion in uncertain information system, the disadvantage of the traditional analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is analyzed; the Method of weight assignment for multi-criterion based on grey interval AHP is put forward. At first, grey interval numbers are imported as a mean to deal with the evaluation information in the proposed method, the quantitative representation of uncertain information is carried out; the loss of information is decreased. Then, base on grey relation analysis and AHP, the relational degree of each criterion is calculated by using grey interval relation analysis, which reflects the relative important degree of each criterion. The judgment matrix is constructed, which fits in with consistent requirements spontaneously. The weight value of each criterion is achieved. Finally, the evaluation example proves that the proposed method is feasible.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil Engineering and Architecture

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 243-249)

Pages:

5285-5288

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.243-249.5285

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Chun Yan Xia, Yan Jie Liu, Dong Mei Liu

Keywords:

Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP), Grey Relation Analysis, Multi-Criterion, Uncertain Information, Weight

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Yingming Wang, Taha M.S. Elhag: Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 7 (2006), pp.2456-2471

Google Scholar

[2] Jian Ma, Zhiping Fan, Lihua Huang: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 112 (1999), pp.397-404

Google Scholar

[3] Metin Dağdeviren, Serkan Yavuz and Nevzatilinç: Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 4 (2009), pp.8143-8151

Google Scholar

[4] Kwon Eun-ha, Ko Won II: Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 7 (2009), pp.910-916

Google Scholar

[5] Jerzy Michnik, Meichen Lo: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 3 (2009), pp.850-856

Google Scholar

[6] Jie. Gao, Linyan Sun and Jin He: Systems Engineering-theory & Practice, Vol. 3 (2004) pp.103-106 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] Suicheng Li, Jingdong Chen and Haigang Zhao: Systems Engineering-theory & Practice, Vol. 6 (2001), pp.22-27 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Xiaxin Chen, Sifeng Liu: System Engineering and Electronics, Vol. 4 (2009), pp.843-846(in Chinese)

Google Scholar