Responses of Concrete-Filled Cold-Formed Square Hollow and Double-C Steel Stub Columns under Cyclic and Repeated Loadings

Abstract:

This paper presents an experimental study on the response of 18 concrete-filled cold-formed square hollow and double-C steel stub columns under cyclic and repeated loading. The test parameters were (1) infilled materials, i.e. No fill, concrete infilled and mortar infilled columns (2) cross sectional shape and dimension. The effect of lips in double-c section as inside stiffeners is presented. The cyclic tested results indicate the infilled columns possess higher bearing capacity, especially infilled materials with higher strength and non-compact section columns. However, there is no different in ultimate tensile. Moreover, the infilled columns showed larger area under post-yield hysteretic loops leading to better seismic performance. Failure of columns was modified in which the failure mode was shifted from the in-outward local buckling into the outward manner, consequently resulted to higher bearing capacity.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 255-260)
• Pages: 198-203
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.198
• Online since: May 2011
• Authors: Chayanon Hansapinyo
• Keywords: Cyclic Loading, Earthquake, In-Filled Concrete, Steel Stub Column, Strengthening

References

[1] FEMA: FEMA 273 – NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, USA 1997).

[2] Federation International du Beton (FIB): Externally Bonded FRP Reinforcement for RC Structures, FIB Bulletin No. 14, Lausanne (2001).

DOI: 10.35789/fib.bull.0014.ch01

[3] Federation International du Beton (FIB): Retrofitting of Concrete Structures by Externally Bonded FRPs with Emphasis on Seismic Applications, FIB Bulletin No. 35, Lausanne (2006).

DOI: 10.35789/fib.bull.0035

[4] S. Pampanin, D. Bolognini and A. Pavese: J. Compos. for Constr. Volume 11, Issue 2 (2007), pp.211-226.

[5] S. Pampanin and C. Christopoulos: fib2003 Symp. Concrete Struct. in Seismic Regions, Athens (2003).

[6] S. P. Schneider: Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 124(10), (1998), p.1125–38.

[7] R. Q. Bridge and M. D. O'Shea: Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 2 (1999), 19–30.

[8] B. Uy: Journal of Structural, Engineering ASCE, 126(3), (2000), p.341–52.

[9] A. K. Jain, S. C. Goel and R. D Hanson: Journal of the Structural Division ASCE, 106(ST8), (1980), p.1777–95.

[10] A. M. Remennikov and W. R. Walpole: Engineering Structures, 20(8), (1998), p.779–82.

[11] R. Tremblay: Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 58 (2002), p.665–701.

[12] J. M. Goggins, B. M. Broderic, A. Y. Elghazouli and A. S. Lucas: Engineering Structures, 27 (2005), pp.977-989.

[13] British Standard Institute: BS EN 10002-1:2001. Metallic Materials – Tensile Testing-Part 1: Method of Test at Ambient Temperature. London: BSI; (2001).

[14] Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures: Part 1.1 General Rules and Rules for Buildings, Brussels, Commission of European Communities, (1994).

DOI: 10.3403/03221508

[15] ACI Committee 318: ACI318-02-Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Detroit, (2002).

[16] L. Guo, S. Zhang., W. Kim and G. Ranzi: Thin-Walled Structures; 45 (2007), 961-973.