Five-Element Connection Number Method for Seismic Damage Evaluation on RC Structure

Article Preview

Abstract:

In view of the problem that seismic damage evaluation for reinforced concrete structure are difficult to quantify, a new model for seismic damage evaluation was established by five-element connection number based on set pair analysis in the paper, which took internal damage index, maximum inter-storey drift, number of inelastic cycles and energy-concentrated quotient as evaluation factors. All indexes can be summarized into five-element connection number. Four different types of structure are analyzed on the model with more satisfactory results. Compared with the matter-element analysis evaluation method, this model is perfect, the evaluating result is more reasonable and its resolving power is higher. By this practical example, the model proved to be effective in seismic damage evaluation on reinforced concrete structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 255-260)

Pages:

2461-2465

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.C. Ren, J. P. Ou and J. F. Jia: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing (2008), p.17

Google Scholar

[2] E.I. Andreadis and I.M. Siouris: The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing (2008), p.12

Google Scholar

[3] K.Q. Zhao and A.L. Xuan: Systematic Engineering, vol. 14(1996), p.18

Google Scholar

[4] F.X. Li, P. Mei and W. Chen: Environmental Engineering, vol. 4(2006), p.77

Google Scholar

[5] M.R. Su, Z.F. Yang and B. Chen: Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 14 (2009), p.1773

Google Scholar

[6] Y.L. Jiang, C.F. Xu and Y. Yao: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Shanghai (2004), p.1717

Google Scholar

[7] Y.H. Ye and Y.L. Wu: Metal Mine, vol. 6 (2000), p.23

Google Scholar

[8] L.H. Feng, X. C. Zhang and J. L. Gong: Hydrology, vol. 24(2004), p.11

Google Scholar

[9] S.L. Su, X. Chen and D. D. Stephen: Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. vol. 24(2010), p.639

Google Scholar

[10] N.F. Pan: Automation in Construction, vol. 17(2008), p.958

Google Scholar

[11] Z.W. Pan, K.Y. Wu: 2009 Chinese Control and Decision Conference, Guilin (2009), p.3562

Google Scholar

[12] J.L. Jin and Y.M. Wei: Generalized intelligent assessment methods for complex systems and applications, Beijing: Science Press (2008)

Google Scholar

[13] H.X. He, W.M. Yan and Y.L. Qiao: Journal of Beijing University of Technology, vol. 32(2006), p.791

Google Scholar