Effect of Environment Factors on Phosphorus Removal Efficiency of Phosphate Reduction System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Effect of environment factors such as initial pH value, dissolved oxygen (DO) and temperature on phosphorus removal efficiency of phosphate reduction system was discussed in treating pickled mustard tube wastewater. Results indicate that environment factors have significant influence on dephosphorization efficiency. And, the impact of DO on phosphate reduction is mainly by affecting the distribution of micro-environment inner biofilm, manifest as phosphate removal rate decreased with a fall in DO concentration, while overhigh DO can lead to detachment of biofilm, thus causing the increase of effluent COD concentration, and so DO need to be controlled in the range of 6 mg/L. Moreover, a higher temperature is more beneficial to phosphorus removal by PRB. Unfortunately, exorbitant temperature can result in mass rearing of Leuconostoc characterized with poor flocculability in reactor, and that cause turbidity in effluent appeared as a rise in COD of effluent. Hence, the optimal temperature is found to be about 30°C.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 255-260)

Pages:

2797-2801

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I. Dévai, L. Felföldy, I. Wittner and S. Plósz: Nature, Vol. 333 (1988), pp.343-345

DOI: 10.1038/333343a0

Google Scholar

[2] Z. P. Liu, S. F. Jia, B. J. Wang and Sh. J. Liu: Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, Vol. 24 (2004), pp.852-857

Google Scholar

[3] Z. P. Liu, B. J. Wang, S. F. Jia and S. J. Liu: Acta Microbiologica Sinica, Vol. 46 (2006), pp.608-612

Google Scholar

[4] K. Q. Zhou, H. Liu, Y. D. Cui, Y. F. Sui and H. C. Deng: Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering, Vol. 59 (2008), pp.1522-1530

Google Scholar

[5] J. Roels and W. Verstraete: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 79 (2001), pp.243-250

Google Scholar

[6] L. L. Ding, H. W. Liang, Y. X. Zhu, W. H. Mo, Q. Wang, H. Q. Ren, X. R. Wang, M. Edwards and D. Glindemann: Chinese Science Bulletin, Vol. 50 (2005), pp.1274-1276

DOI: 10.1007/bf03183704

Google Scholar

[7] X. R. Wang, L. L. Ding, X. J. Niu and H. Q. Ren: Environmental Chemistry, Vol. 22 (2003), pp.485-489

Google Scholar

[8] J. J. Geng, X. C. Jin, Q. Wang, X. J. Niu, X. R. Wang, M. Edwards and D. Glindemann: Anaerobe, Vol. 11 (2005), pp.273-279

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Chen, T. R. Long, J. Zhou, J. Liu and C. J. Gan: Environmental Science, Vol. 30 (2009), pp.109-114

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Z. Li and B. C. Xia: Chinese Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 38 (2007), pp.162-166

Google Scholar