Evaluation of Investment Risk in International Engineering Project Based on Improved Risk Matrix Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, risk acceptability evaluation and risk weight and improved risk level were added in original risk matrix method according to its shortcomings and practicality and need of evaluation of investment risk in international engineering project. A model based on improved risk matrix method was put forward to evaluate investment risk in international engineering project. Firstly, investment risk evaluation index system of international engineering project was established. Secondly, level of risk factors were decided by risk impact level and risk probability scope, borda ordinal value was calculated to form judgment matrix, analytic hierarchy process was introduced to calculate risk weight. Synthetic risk level was determined by product of quantized value of risk level and corresponding risk weight. Risk acceptability evaluation was decided by risk impact level and risk probability scope. Finally, a case study was presented to verify the feasibility of the model which would provide a reliable basis for the investment decision.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 255-260)

Pages:

3887-3892

Citation:

Online since:

May 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Q.H. Zhu, X.G. Kuang, Y.G. Shen, Risk Matrix Method and Its Application in the Field of Technical Project Risk Management, Engineering Sciences, vol.5, January (2003), pp.89-94.

Google Scholar

[2] Yate S J F, Stone E R.Risk Appraisal. New York: John Wiley & SONS Ltd, (1992), pp.387-408.

Google Scholar

[3] Lei Sheng Qiang, Risk Mangement and Insurance of The International Engineering Project. Beijing: China architecture &building press, (1998), pp.6-7.

Google Scholar

[4] Qiu Wan Hua, Methods and Practice of Risk Management of Modern Project. Beijing: Science education press, (2003), pp.45-48.

Google Scholar