[1]
Clement Yu, Yimeng Wei, Wensheng Wu, and King-Lup Liu. "Efficient and Effective Metasearch for Text Databases Incorporating Linkages among Documents. ACM SIGMOD, (2001).
DOI: 10.1145/376284.375684
Google Scholar
[2]
J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Cluster-Based Language Models for Distributed Retrival. Pro. 22nd Ann. Int ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR), (1999).
DOI: 10.1145/312624.312687
Google Scholar
[3]
A. L. Powell, J. C. French, J. P. Callan, M. E. Connell and C. L Viles. The Impact of Database Selection on Distributed Searching. Pro. 23rd Ann. Int ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pg. 232-239. (2000).
DOI: 10.1145/345508.345584
Google Scholar
[4]
D. H. Widyantoro, T. R. Loerger and J. Yen. An Adaptive Investigation for Learning Changes in User Interests. Proc. Eighth ACM Int'I Conf. Infromation and Knowledge Management(CIKM), (1999).
Google Scholar
[5]
Zeng C, Xing CX, Zhou LZ. A personalized Search System by Using Content-based Filtering. Journal of Software. 2003. 5.
Google Scholar
[6]
T. Joachims, D. Freitag, and T. Mitchell. WebWatcher: A Tour Guide for the World Wide Web. Proc. 15th int'1 Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI), (1997).
Google Scholar
[7]
K. Bollacker, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles, A System for Automatic Personalized Tracking of Scientific Literature on the Web. Proc. Fourth ACM Conf. Digital Libraries, (1999).
DOI: 10.1145/313238.313270
Google Scholar
[8]
J. Budzik and K. Hammond. Watson: Anticipation and Contextualizing Iinformation Needs. Proc. 62nd Ann. Meeting Am. Soc. Information Science, (1999).
Google Scholar
[9]
Fang Liu, Clement Yu, and Weiyi Merg. Personalized Web Search for Improving Retrieval Effectiveness. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2004. 1.
DOI: 10.1109/tkde.2004.1264820
Google Scholar
[10]
A. L. Powell, J. C. French, J. P. Callan, M. E. Connell and C. L Viles. The Impact of Database Selection on Distributed Searching. Pro. 23rd Ann. Int ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pg. 232-239. (2000).
DOI: 10.1145/345508.345584
Google Scholar