Regression Analysis on the Evaluation Index for Undergraduate's Grades in C Language

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order for undergraduates to master basic skills of computer technology, the grades in C language be evaluated as the important indicator of the level of a college computer basic education. This paper exploits the data from a cohort of the Jianghan University undergraduates to explore the extent to which the impacts of the evaluation index are specific to grades in C language. Using regression techniques, the paper tries to provide some references for colleges to improve the basic education of computer.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 271-273)

Pages:

270-274

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Freedman: Statistics. New York: W.W. Norton (1998).

Google Scholar

[2] Tsai-Yen Li, Hao-Chuan Wang, Chun-Yen Chang: Assessing Creative Problem-solving with Automated Text Grading. Computers & Education, Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp: 1450-1466, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.006

Google Scholar

[3] J. Randall, G. Engelhard: Examining the Grading Practices of Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 26, Issue 7, October 2010, pp: 1372-1380.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.03.008

Google Scholar

[4] C.L. DeBerg, J.R. Wilson: An Empirical Investigation of the Potential Confounding Variables in Student Evaluation of Teaching. Journal of Accounting Education, Volume 8, Issue 1, Spring 1990, pp: 37-62.

DOI: 10.1016/0748-5751(90)90019-4

Google Scholar

[5] K. Ahmad: Computers, Language Learning and Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1985).

Google Scholar

[6] R. J. Stapleton, G. Murkison: Optimizing the Fairness of Student Evaluations: A Study of Correlations between Instructor Excellence, Study Production, Learning Production, and Expected Grades. Journal of Management Education; Jun 2001, 25, 3, pp: 269-291.

DOI: 10.1177/105256290102500302

Google Scholar