Study on Competition Motivation to the Intention of Adventurous Players

Abstract:

Research on behavioral intention model theory, with the national equestrian team, national basketball team and the 2010 National University Games 120 athletes (including 60 male athletes, the athletes belong to the collective project of 60) as the experimental objects, Started by the method of implicit cues and reward leads the race on the movement of risk behaviors reported.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 271-273)
• Pages: 764-769
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.271-273.764
• Online since: July 2011
• Authors: Hong Yu Wu, Bo Shi
• Keywords: Adventure, Athlete, Behavioral Intention Model, Competition Motivation, Experiment

References

[1] Bargh J.A., &Ezequiel,M. (2008). The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 73–79.

[2] Byrnes J.P., Miller D.C., &Schafer W.D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367

[3] Farthing G.W. (2005). Attitudes toward heroic and nonheroic physical risk takers as mates and as friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 171–185.

DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.004

[4] Fan Jin, Choi wild, in the crystal. Our Elite rowers and the motivation level of the relationship between sports performance [J]. Journal of Shenyang Institute of Physical Education, 2002 (2) : 31-32.

[5] Sun Mingxin. competitive sports athletes in the motivational system of factor analysis [EB / OL] http: /www. lwlib. com/html/html/shehuilunwen/qitashehuixuelunw/2010/0113/186472. html. 2010-01-13.

[6] Shiyan. Advantages of a high level of athletes at risk of item identification, assessment and response to [D]. Beijing: Beijing Sports University, (2004).

[7] Lu Wenyun. Xiong Xiao-being. The risk of major sports events and risk management [J]. Chengdu Sport University. 2005. 3l (5): l8-22.

[8] Fan Ming, Chen Xiyao. The risk of major sporting events on the identification of [J]. Sports Science Research. 2005. 26 (3) : 27-29.

[9] Xie non-. optimism and risk analysis of gender differences in the [J]. Peking University (Natural Science), 2003, 39 (2). Table 1 Collective project male athletes and female athletes under different risk reward cues intention of M (SD) Gender Treatment conditions Economic Risk P Social Risk P Entertainment Risk P Health Risk P Male Win.

[18] 55（2. 09）.

[11] 01（6. 43）.

[15] 38（3. 19）.

[19] 27（3. 02） ns Rewards.

[17] 37（2. 49）.

[10] 65（2. 67）.

[13] 74（3. 33）.

[19] 17（4. 66） Female Win.

[18] 71（4. 16）.

[10] 14（4. 01） ns.

[13] 41（1. 73） ns.

[18] 88（4. 58） ns Rewards.

[15] 68（2. 52）.

[10] 38（2. 52）.

[12] 74（3. 13）.

[18] 91（5. 12） Note: * P＜0. 01，* P＜0. 05，same as follows Table 2 Personal projects different from male athletes and female athletes' intention to reward risk-taking under the analysis of clues to M (SD) Gender Treatment conditions Economic Risk P Social Risk P Entertainment Risk P Health Risk P Male Win.

[18] 09（2. 21）.

[12] 09（6. 55）.

[16] 43（3. 32）.

[22] 38（3. 54） * Rewards.

[19] 17（2. 38）.

[10] 71（2. 32）.

[10] 57（3. 02）.

[21] 69（4. 76） Female Win.

[18] 63（4. 11）.

[10] 11（4. 34） ns.

[13] 61（1. 75） ns.

[22] 12（4. 58） ns Rewards.

[17] 99（2. 08）.

[10] 52（2. 04）.

[13] 72（2. 46）.

[21] 99（3. 65） Specific individuals or groups that do not do the beliefs and the corresponding motivation Attitude Lead to some results on the behavior of individual beliefs and the evaluation of these results Subjective criteria norms and attitudes Aim Action Figure 1. Behavioral Intention Model (Martin Fishbein and Lcek Ajen, 1980) （Martin Fishbein and Lcek Ajen，1980）.