Influence of Catalyst and Temperature on Gasification Performance

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present study the catalytic steam gasification of biomass to produce hydrogen-rich gas with calcined dolomite and Nano-NiO/γ-Al2O3 as catalyst in an externally heated fixed bed reactor was investigated. The influence of the catalyst and reactor temperature on gasification performance was studied at the temperature range of 700°C-900°C. Over the ranges of experimental conditions examined, Nano-NiO/γ-Al2O3 and calcined dolomite both revealed better catalytic performance, at the presence of steam, tar was completely decomposed as temperature increases from 800°C to 900°C. Higher temperature resulted in more H2 and CO2 production, and dry gas yield. The highest H2 content of 58.27V% and the highest H2 yield of 2.23 Nm3/ kg biomass were observed at the highest temperature level of 900°C.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

90-95

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Demirbas, Prog Energ Combust 33 (2007) 1.

Google Scholar

[2] J. C. Escobar, E. S. Lora, O. J. Venturini, E. E. Y Ez, E. F. Castillo and O. Almazan, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (2009) 1275.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.014

Google Scholar

[3] X. T. Li, J. R. Grace, C. J. Lim, A. P. Watkinson, H. P. Chen and J. R. Kim, Biomass and Bioenergy 26 (2004) 171.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Maniatis and E. Millich, Biomass and Bioenergy 15 (1998) 195.

Google Scholar

[5] R. C. Saxena, D. K. Adhikari and H. B. Goyal, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (2009) 167.

Google Scholar

[6] A. L. Dicks, J Power Sources 61 (1996) 113.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Wang, C. L. Weller, D. D. Jones and M. A. Hanna, Biomass and Bioenergy 32 (2008) 573.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Weerachanchai, M. Horio and C. Tangsathitkulchai, Bioresource Technol 100 (2009) 1419.

Google Scholar

[9] X. H. Hao, L. J. Guo, X. Mao, X. M. Zhang and X. J. Chen, Int J Hydrogen Energ 28 (2003) 55.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Iaquaniello and A. Mangiapane, Int J Hydrogen Energ 31 (2006) 399.

Google Scholar

[11] G. Hu, S. Xu, S. Li, C. Xiao and S. Liu, Fuel Process Technol 87 (2006) 375.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Turn, C. Kinoshita, Z. Zhang, D. Ishimura and J. Zhou, Int J Hydrogen Energ 23 (1998) 641.

Google Scholar

[13] A. K. Dalai, N. Batta, I. Eswaramoorthi and G. J. Schoenau, Waste Manage 29 (2009) 252.

Google Scholar

[14] L. Wei, S. Xu, L. Zhang, C. Liu, H. Zhu and S. Liu, Int J Hydrogen Energ 32 (2007) 24.

Google Scholar

[15] K. Gallucci, S. Stendardo and P. U. Foscolo, Int J Hydrogen Energ 33 (2008) 3049.

Google Scholar

[16] M. R. Mahishi and D. Y. Goswami, Int J Hydrogen Energ 32 (2007) 2803.

Google Scholar

[17] J. A. Medrano, M. Oliva, J. Ruiz, L. Garcia and J. Arauzo, Int J Hydrogen Energ 33 (2008) 4387.

Google Scholar

[18] S. Rapagn, N. Jand and P. U. Foscolo, Int J Hydrogen Energ 23 (1998) 551.

Google Scholar

[19] M. Delgado, M. Bigeriego and E. Glardiola, Biomass and Bioenergy 3 (1992) 57.

Google Scholar