Simulation of Inclusions Removal Influenced by Snorkel and Blowing Parameters in RH Refining

Xin Gang Ai; Sheng Li Li; Ning Wang; Nan Lv

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.291-294.155

Paper Titles

Microstructures and Strength of Hot-Rolled Mg-Zn-Y Alloys
p.137

Toughing of ZrAlN Film through Superlattice Design
p.141

Research on Strip Steel Surface Bright-Field and Dark-Field Images Fusion Method
p.146

Research of GaAs Polishing Uniformity on Non-Abrasive Cryogenic Conditions
p.150

Simulation of Inclusions Removal Influenced by Snorkel and Blowing Parameters in RH Refining
p.155

Surface Characteristics and Water Absorption of Sol-Gel Coated Impregnated Paper Pressed onto Plywood
p.159

Enhancement of Acid Resistance for Ultramarine Blue by Silica Coatings
p.163

TiC Particle Reinforced Reactive Plasma Cladding Composite Coating by the Precursor Carbonization-Composition Process
p.167

Relation between Concave Cone 3 Dimension Topography and Residual Stress in Thermal Barrier Coatings
p.172

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 291-294Simulation of Inclusions Removal Influenced by...

Simulation of Inclusions Removal Influenced by Snorkel and Blowing Parameters in RH Refining

Abstract:

In this paper the influence of snorkel length and snorkel inner diameter and lifting gas flow rate on inclusion removal rate are discussed. It is found that inclusion removal rate varies greatly with snorkel length and snorkel inner diameter. Prolonging the snorkel length is benefited for inclusions removal in RH and inclusion remove time is enhanced, but inclusion remove rate is decreased when snorkel inner diameter is reduced. There is a best lifting gas flow rate for inclusion removal.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Materials Processing Technology, AEMT2011

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 291-294)

Pages:

155-158

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.291-294.155

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2011

Authors:

Xin Gang Ai, Sheng Li Li, Ning Wang, Nan Lv

Keywords:

Blowing Rate, Inclusion, Removal Rate, RH, Snorkel

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] B.G. Thomas, Q. Yuan, L. Zhang, B. Zhao, and S.P. Vanka, 2004 NSF Design, Service, Manufacturing and Industrial Innovation Research Conf., Dallas, Texas, January, 2004, p.5.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Miki, Y. Shimada. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 24(1997), No.8, p.31.

Google Scholar

[3] S.G. Zheng , M.Y. Zhu , S.S. Pan. Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 42(2006), No.6, p.657.

Google Scholar

[4] Treadgold, C.J. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, v 30(2003), No.2, p.120.

Google Scholar

[5] M.Q. Yu, Z.Z. Wang , M.H. Xu, etal. Iron and Steel, 41(2006), No.9, p.26.

Google Scholar

[6] Pradeep K. JHA, P. Srinivasa RAO and Anupam DEWAN. Transactions of the Iron and Steel Institute of Japan, 2008, 2(48) , p.154.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Kamata, H. Matrumura, H. Miyasaka, et al. Steelmaking Conference Proceedings, 1998, p.606.

Google Scholar