The Rockburst Experiment Usage of Similar Material and the Mechanism of the Energy Releasing

Article Preview

Abstract:

As one of the geological disasters, rockburst is often generated in underground engineering under excavation unloading conditions in high geostress areas. Taking advantage of the simulation test especially for the rock mass under high hydrostatic stress, the dynamic failure rockburst style resulted from instantaneous unloading in one direction was studied, whose peak velocity and acting time are analyzed. The results indicate that the formula for calculating peak velocity and the kinetic energy is proper and the kinetic energy is little portion of the recovery strain energy, most of which is dissipation in different ways; the unloading time at different positions apart from the free surface is nearly the same and more larger than the unloading wave’s disturbance time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 295-297)

Pages:

378-382

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhonghu Zhao, Heping Xie. Energy Transfer and Energy Dissipation in Rock Deformation and Fracture[J]. Journal of Sichuan university(engineering science edition). 2008, 40(2), 26-31. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] Cook N.G.W, Hoek E. Pretorius J P G, Rock Mechanics applied to the study of rock bursts. J. S. Afr. Inst.Min.Metell, 1965, 66: 435-528.

Google Scholar

[3] Weizhong Chen, Senpeng Lu, Xiaohong Guo, Chunjiang Qiao. Research on unloading confining pressure tests and rock burst criterion based on energy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. 2009, 28(8),1530-1540. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Liming Zhang, Zaiquan Wang, Junzheng He, Bingdi Ren. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. 2005, 24(1), 4769-4773. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] Yishan Pan, Mengtao Zhang, Laigui Wang. Research on the tests of rock burst of the underground chamber simulated by similar materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1997, 19(4): 49-56. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] Burgert W, Lippman M. Models of Translatory Rock Bursting in Coal[J]. Int J Rock Mech Sci & Geomech. Abstr ,1981 ,18: 285-294.

DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(81)91193-1

Google Scholar

[7] Shuqing Yang, Zhongting Zhang, Jiayou Lu, Lihui Du. Study on the tunnel rockburst mechanism in the physical model[C]. The Second National Conference on Rock numerical simulation and model test. Shanghai: Tongji university press, 1990, 598-606. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Zemin Xu, Runqiu Huang, Xingchun Luo, Rui Li, Jingyi Sun. Limitations of static load theory in rock burst research and preliminary analysis on dynamics mechanism of rockburst[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. 2003, 22(8), 1255-1262. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] B.B. Aduskin, A.A. Spivak. Geomechanics of large scale explosions. Bowels, 1993. (in Russian)

Google Scholar

[10] В.С. Nikiforovsky, Е.И. Shemiyakin. Dynamic fracture of solid[M]: Science, 1979. (in Russian)

Google Scholar

[11] Cherepanov, trasnated by Roland de Wit, Willian C. Cooley. Mechanics of Brittle Fracture[M]. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.

Google Scholar

[12] Mingyang Wang, Liyun Wang, Chengzhi Qi, Qihu Qian. Study on the deformation and failure of the rock on explosive loading[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engenerring, 2003, 23(3), 9-20. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[13] Hongfei Xiao, Xueqiu He, Tao Feng. Research on coupling laws between EME and stress fields during deformation and fracture of coal an d rock in uniaxial compression[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering.2004,23(23): 3948-3953. (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] Homand F. et al. Dynamic phenomena in mines and characteristics of rocks[J]. Rock burst and Seismicity in mines, Faihurst ed.Rotterdam: Balkema, 1990: 139-142.

Google Scholar