Static Friction Research of LIGA-Microstructure: Comparison between Theory and Experiments

Article Preview

Abstract:

Micro electro mechanical system (MEMS) has been increasingly used in military application. For the reliability and specialty of military requirements, the material of the MEMS device is supposed to be metal and the device is moveable. Lithographic, Galvanoforming, Abformung (LIGA) technology capable of producing high aspect ratio structures in metals like nickel is one of the important fabrication technologies in military MEMS. There are many moveable MEMS device like micro-gear and micro-slider producing by LIGA technology. But the moveable devices cannot behave well because of the friction effect. In this paper, an improved elastic-plastic model including roughness effects and an experimental procedure that predict the static friction prosperity of LIGA-processed nickel is proposed. Firstly, we use the 3D optical profilometer to research the surface roughness of LIGA-processed nickel, the surface heights distribution was found to be nearly Gaussian distribution. Secondly, the static friction model, the Kogut-Etsion (KE) model is adopted to obtain the static friction coefficient. Finally, a special designed static friction coefficient measurement apparatus is used to conduct the friction experiments. The results indicate that the surface roughness affects the friction and the smoother surface leads to a higher friction coefficient. Also good agreement was found between simulations and experimental results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 301-303)

Pages:

1109-1114

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] U. Beerschwinger, S.J. Yang, R.L. Reuben, M.R. Taghizadeh and U. Wallrabe: Friction Measurements on LIGA-processed Microstructure. J. Micromech. Microeng. Vol. 4 (1994), pp.14-22.

DOI: 10.1088/0960-1317/4/1/002

Google Scholar

[2] T. Bieger and U. Wallrable: Tribological Investigations of LIGA-microstructures. Microsystem Technologies. Vol. 2 (1996), pp.63-70.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02447752

Google Scholar

[3] K. Lian, J.C. Jiang and Z.G. Ling: Processing-microstructure-resulting Materials Properties of LIGA Ni. Microsyst Technol. Vol. 13(2007), pp.259-264.

DOI: 10.1007/s00542-006-0195-y

Google Scholar

[4] A.S.M.A. Haseeb, U. Albers and K. Bade: Friction and Wear Characteristics of Electrodeposited Nanocrystalline Nickel-tungsten Alloy Films. Wear. Vol. 264(2008), pp.106-112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.02.004

Google Scholar

[5] J.A. Greenwood and J.B.P. Williamson: Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces. Proc.R. Soc. London, Ser.A. Vol. 295(1966), pp.300-319.

Google Scholar

[6] W.R. Chang, I. Etsion and D.B. Bogy: Static Friction Coefficient Model for Metallic Rough Surfaces. ASME J. Tribol. Vol. 110(1988), pp.57-63.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3261575

Google Scholar

[7] L. Kogut and I. Etsion: A Static Friction Model for Elastic-Plastic Contacting Rough Surfaces. ASME J. Tribol. Vol. 126(2004), pp.34-40.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1609488

Google Scholar

[8] C.H. Lee and A. Polycarpou: Static Friction Experiments and Verification of an Improved Elastic-Plastic Model Including Roughness Effects. ASME J. Tribol. Vol. 129(2007), pp.754-760.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2768074

Google Scholar

[9] C.H. Lee, M. Eriten and A. Polycarpou: Application of Elastic-Plastic Static Friction Models to Rough Surfaces With Asymmetric Asperity Distribution. ASME J. Tribol. Vol. 132(2010), pp.1-11.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4001547

Google Scholar

[10] N. Tayebi and A. Polycarpou: Reducing the Effects of Adhesion and Friction in microelectromechanical systems (MEMSs) through Surface Roughening: Comparison between Theory and Experiments. J. APPLIED PHYSICS. Vol. 98 (2005), pp.1-13.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2058178

Google Scholar

[11] J.I. McCool: Relating Profile Instrument Measurements to the Functional Performance of Rough Surfaces. ASME J. Tribol. Vol. 109 (1986), pp.264-270.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3261349

Google Scholar