Curvature Testing the Residual Stresses in 3%TiO2-Al2O3 Coatings by Thermal Spraying Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

Plasma thermal spraying technique was adopted to deposit five groups of different thickness 3% TiO2-Al2O3 coatings on 329-Stainless steel. A curvature method was applied to study the residual stresses. Results showed that the deformations corresponding to 3% TiO2-Al2O3/329-SS systems were serious. The residual stress changed with the ξ (ratio of coatings’ thickness to substrate’s thickness) value and weren’t constants for the coatings’ thickness 52-306 μm. No regardless of using the Stoney’ or Tomanov’ formula to calculate the residual stresses, which decreased with the ratio ξ value increased, and the thinner coatings were, the greater the residual stresses were. The coatings’ residual stresses changed with the ξ value at an exponent relation. The coatings’ thickness affects greatly on their residual stresses, especially for the intrinsic stresses. When the coatings thickness changes from 52 to 306 μm, the residual stresses were always compressive stresses. The maximums residual stresses were caused when the ξ value is 0.115 (the minimum value), and the details were -584.96 MPa and -482.78 MPa by two difference formulas, respectively.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 314-316)

Pages:

48-52

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Stokes, L. Looney: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 177–178 (2004), p.18

Google Scholar

[2] M. Lugovya, V. Slyunyayeva, V. Teixeirab: Surf. Coat. Technol Vol. 184 (2004), p.331

Google Scholar

[3] G. Bolelli, L. Lusvarghi, M. Barletta: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 202 (2008), p.4810

Google Scholar

[4] J.A. Marin de Camargo, H.J. Cornelis: Surf. Coat. Technol Vol. 201 (2007), p.9448

Google Scholar

[5] G. Montay, A. Cherouat, J. Lu: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 155(2002), p.152

Google Scholar

[6] Y. T. Yu, W. Z Yuan, D. Y Qiao: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 43(2007), p.78

Google Scholar

[7] R. Ahmed, V. Stoica, J. R. Santisteban: Materials Sci. and Eng. A Vol. 498(2008), p.191

Google Scholar

[8] H. Wu, Y.G. Meng, C. J. Su: Journal of Mechanical Strength Vol. 29(2007), p.233

Google Scholar

[9] H. Lu, X. S. Liu, Z. Zhu: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Vol. 21 (2008), p.91

Google Scholar

[10] C. Quaeyhegens, G. Knuyt, L. M. Stals: Surf. Coat. Technol Vol. 74-75(1995), p.104

Google Scholar

[11] E. Heyen, O. Bauer: International Zeitschrift Fur-metallographic Vol., 1(1911), p.16

Google Scholar

[12] B. A. Lyashenko, A. V. Ruthovskii, E. B. Soroka: Strength of materials Vol. 33(2001), p.344

Google Scholar

[13] C. Mendibide, P. Steyer, C. Esnouf: Surface and Coatings Technology Vol. 200(2005), p.165

Google Scholar

[14] M. F. Doerner, D. S. Gardner, W. D. Nix: J. Mater. Res. Vol. 1(1986), p.845

Google Scholar

[15] E. Celik, O. Sarikaya: Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 379(2004), p.11

Google Scholar

[16] G. G. Stoney: Proc. Roy. Soc., London, Ser. A Vol. 82(1909), p.172

Google Scholar

[17] A. T. Tomanov, Methods for Testing, Evaluation and Investigation of Engineering Materials (Moscow Publications, Mashinostroenie 1974)

Google Scholar