Analysis of Field Reliability of Two Models of Heavy Vehicles

Jing Xu; R. Jiang; Hao Zhou

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.317-319.1733

Paper Titles

Spring Force Compensation for Bond Head
p.1711

A Visualized Investigation of Void Growth and Coalescence in Pure Copper Sheets under Impact Tension
p.1717

A Validity Analysis of Estimate Improvement Model of Software Cost
p.1725

Analysis on the Stress and Deformation of Deep Excavation Simulated by Multiplying ANSYS and ABAQUS
p.1729

Analysis of Field Reliability of Two Models of Heavy Vehicles
p.1733

Analysis of Dynamic Behavior of Zigzag Groove Setback Arming Device with Two Degree of Freedom
p.1739

Study on the Evaluation Model for Network Security
p.1745

Studies on the Integration of Geographic Information System (GIS) and Drainage Pipe Network Model
p.1749

A Conceptual Framework for Ensuring the Implementation of the Public Warehouse Based on RFID
p.1755

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 317-319Analysis of Field Reliability of Two Models of...

Analysis of Field Reliability of Two Models of Heavy Vehicles

Abstract:

A steel mill uses four functionally identical heavy vehicles manufactured by two different manufacturers. The information of failure time and downtime is available. This paper aims to compare the field reliability of the vehicles based on the field repair reports. A cost model is developed to comprehensively evaluate the overall performance of the vehicle. The preventive maintenance frequency of the vehicle is determined based on an empirical approach. The study is useful for the manufacturer to have a clear picture on the competability of its product and is also useful for the user to select an appropriate model of vehicles.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Equipment Manufacturing Technology and Automation

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 317-319)

Pages:

1733-1738

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.317-319.1733

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2011

Authors:

Jing Xu, R. Jiang, Hao Zhou

Keywords:

Field Reliability, Heavy Vehicle, Life Cycle Cost (LCC), Preventive Maintenance

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] H.E. Ascher and H. Feingold,Repairable Systems Reliability: Modeling, Inference, Misconceptions and their Causes. Marcel Dekker, New York, (1984).

DOI: 10.1002/qre.4680010219

Google Scholar

[2] R. Jiang and D.N.P. Murthy, Maintenance: Decision Models for Management, Science Press, Beijing, 2008.

Google Scholar

[3] K.A.H. Kobbacy, B.B. Fawzi and D.F. Percy, H.E. Ascher. A full history proportional hazards model for PM scheduling. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 13, (1997), 187–198.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1638(199707)13:4<187::aid-qre98>3.0.co;2-l

Google Scholar

[4] D. Lugtigheid, D. Banjevic and A.K.S. Jardine, Modeling repairable systems reliability with explanatory variables and repair and maintenance actions. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 15, (2004), 89–110.

DOI: 10.1093/imaman/15.2.89

Google Scholar