Optimization of Hydrolysis Pretreatment Conditions with Two Kinds of Enzymes for Enhanced Proteolysis in Egg Yolk Solution Using Response Surface Methodology

Abstract:

Response surface methodology was used to optimize proteolysis of egg yolk solution using Alcalase and Flavorase according to three conditions, the ratio of two enzyme concentration (Alcalase and Flavorase), pH values and hydrolytic time. The responses degree of hydrolyzation (DH) and peptide yield were studied. The protein subunit from egg yolk was purified and hydrolyzed by Alcalase and Flavorase step by step. The results showed that the best ratio of enzyme concentration was 0.8% for Alcalase, and 0.4% for Flavorase to hydrolyzed 10% yolk solution. The hydrolytic time of the two enzymes was 2h respectively. Then the solution was incubated for 4h at 55°C while rotating at 60 r./min. To evaluate the hydrolysate, both the degrees of hydrolysis (DH) and the yields of the polypeptides were taken into consideration. The optimum ratios of enzyme and hydrolytic time were 2.43 and 1.14 respectively, and the optimum pH was 6.64. The optimized DH was 13.233%, and peptide yield was up to 45.573mg/ml.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 317-319)
• Pages: 2208-2214
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.317-319.2208
• Online since: August 2011
• Authors: Na Yu, Jia Yan Qin, Hong Yu Bao, Xi Qing Yue
• Keywords: Enzymes, Proteolysis, RSM, Yolk Protein

References

[1] Bonomi F,Fiocchi A,Frokjaer H,Gaiaschi A,Iametti S, Poiesi C,Rasmussen P,Restani P,Rovere P (2003) J Dairy Res. 70:51–59

DOI: 10.1017/s0022029902005678

[2] Ziegler F, Nitenberg G, Coudray-Lucas C, Lasser P, Giboudeau J, Cynober L (1998) Am J Clin Nutr. 67:124–128

DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/67.1.124

[3] Gobbetti M, Stepaniak L, De Angelis M, Corsetti A, Di Cagno R (2002) Crit Rev Food Sci 42:223–239

DOI: 10.1080/10408690290825538

[4] FitzGerald RJ, Meisel A (2003) Milk protein hydrolysates and bioactive peptides. In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH (eds) Advanced dairy chemistry, vol 1, proteins, 3rd edn. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, p.675–698

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8602-3_20

[5] Dziuba J, Minkiewicz P, Nalecz D, Iwaniak A (1999) Nahrung 43:190–195

[6] Pripp AH, Isaksson T, Stepaniak L, Sørhaug T (2004) Eur Food Res. Technol. 219:579–583

DOI: 10.1007/s00217-004-1004-4

[7] Wuxi Light Manufacturing University, Food Analysis, [M],Beijing, Light Manufacture Publisher of China, 2006．14—112．（In Chinese）

[8] Etsushiro Doi,Taihei Koseki,Naofuml Kitabatake(1987)E.DOIETAL [J]64:1697-1703

[9] Are Hugo Pripp, (2005)Eur Food Res. Technol. [J]221: 712–716

[10] S. Kaur & B. C. Sarkar & H. K. Sharma &Charanjiv (2009) Singh Food Bioprocess Technol [J] 2:96–100

[11] Ji Young Lim, Hyang-Sik Yoon, Kwang-Yup Kim, Ki-Sik Kim, Jae Goan Noh, and In Gyu (2010)Song Food Sci. Biotechnol. [J]19(5): 1135-1142

[12] Jin Liang,Feng Li,Yong Fang,Wenjian Yang Xinxin An,Liyan Zhao,Zhihong Xin,Qiuhui Hu Eur (2010)Food Res. Technol. 231:917–924 A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 Fig. 2 Contour map on DH Fig. 3 Contour map on peptide yield