Flexible Polishing Machine with Dual Grinding Heads for Aeroengine Blade and Blisk

Article Preview

Abstract:

The blade and blisk manufacturing includes polishing process when the surface roughness and size requirement of profile are disqualified after milling process. This polishing process is mainly carried out manually by skilled workers or NC machines. However, the existing polishing technology always leads to surface quality instability and inconsistency because of the complex free-form surface of blade and blisk. Therefore, in this paper, based on the research of polishing requirements and methods of blade and blisk, an automatic 6-axis polishing machine was proposed in order to enhance surface quality. And then, a polishing mechanism was designed using flexible technique to make the polishing tool accommodate surface waviness which was produced in milling process. In addition, the working principle and control method of flexible polishing mechanism were studied. Finally, the polishing test results of blade and blisk showed that the profile error was about 0.06mm and the surface roughness was less than Ra0.4 after automatic polishing. Compared with the manual polishing process, the automatic polishing technology not only increased the polishing efficiency and quality stability, but also reduced labor intensity largely.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 317-319)

Pages:

2454-2460

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Huang, Z. M. Gong, X. Q. Chen and L. Zhou: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 127 (2002), p.140

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Q. Sun, G. David and J, K. Kazem: Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Vol. 25 (2009), p.204

Google Scholar

[3] M. Sabourin, F. Paquet, B. Hazel, J. Côté and P. Mongenot: International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry. Montréal, Canada, October 5-7, (2010)

DOI: 10.1109/carpi.2010.5624446

Google Scholar

[4] Xiaojun Wu, Yoshihiro Kita and Kiku Ikoku: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 187–188 (2007), p.81

Google Scholar

[5] Zhi Huang, Yun Huang, Ming de Zhang and Xiao dong Guo: Journal of Chongqing Univer sity Vol. 31 (2008), p.598. In Chinese

Google Scholar

[6] Daqi Li, Lei Zhang, Xu Yang, Heran Yang and Tongzhan Li: International Conference on Information and Automation June 20 - 23, Harbin, China

DOI: 10.1109/csae.2011.5952448

Google Scholar

[7] Xiangdong Liu, Tian Ji, Zhanyuan Pang and Zhen Chen: Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique Vol. 3 (2009), p.12. In Chinese

Google Scholar

[8] Yun Huang and Zhi Huang: China Mechanical Engineering Vol. 18 (2007), p.2263 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] JOURANI A, DURSAPT A and HAMDI H: Wear Vol. 259 (2005), p.1137

Google Scholar

[10] Wei Jiajun, Wang Ke and Sun Xingwei: Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Natural Computing, (2010)

DOI: 10.1109/cinc.2010.5643875

Google Scholar

[11] Xiaofei Yang and Wanmin Bai: Machinery Design & Manufacture Vol. 2 (2008), p.124. In Chinese

Google Scholar

[12] Min Kang and Jiawen Xu: Tool Engineering Vol. 36 (2002), p.55. In Chinese

Google Scholar