Thickness Optimization of SPF for Titanium Alloy Negative Angle Parts

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the Superplastic forming technology, the problem that the forming of the complex titanium alloy parts is difficult has been solved. The high temperature forming characteristics of the titanium alloy material and the establishment of the constitutive model of material that will be used as the material model of the simulation of the material forming (the minimum thickness is larger than 0.8 mm) about the negative Angle parts are based on high-temperature tensile test. The influence of the thickness of the parts is analyzed from three different SPF schemes, which are simulated by the MSC.MARC software. The results demonstrate the parts taking advantage of two-stage SPF, which is consisted of concave die SPF method and convex die SPF method can meet the requirement of minimum thickness and improve the thickness distribution on the die draft sides. Furthermore, the thickness distribution of the parts is more uniform with the convex die SPF method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 328-330)

Pages:

1395-1402

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.G. Luckey, P.A. Friedman and K.J. Weinmann: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 194 (2007) No. 4, p.30.

Google Scholar

[2] N. Cappetti, L. Garofalo, A. Naddeo, M. Nastasia and A. Pellegrino: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 138 (2003) No2, p.417.

Google Scholar

[3] W.D. Brewer, R.K. Bird and T.A. Wallace: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. A243 (1998) No. 1-2, p.299.

Google Scholar

[4] P.A. Friedman, S.G. Luckey, W.B. Copple, R. Allor, C.E. Miller and C. Young: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, Vol. 13 (2004) No. 6, p.670.

DOI: 10.1361/10599490421277

Google Scholar

[5] A. Dutta: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. A371 (2004) No. 1-2, p.79.

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Chen, K. Kibble, R. Hall and X. Huang: Materials and Design, Vol. 22 (2001) No. 8, p.679.

Google Scholar

[7] G. Giuliano and S. Franchitti: International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, Vol. 48 (2008) No. 12-13, p.1519.

Google Scholar

[8] G. Giuliano: Materials and Design, Vol. 29 (2008) No. 7, p.1330.

Google Scholar

[9] J.H. Yoon, H.S. Lee and Y.M. Yi: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 201 (2008) No. 1-3, p.68.

Google Scholar

[10] L. Carrino, G. Giuliano and C. Palmieri: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vols. 143–144 (2003) No. 1, p.373.

Google Scholar

[11] M.A. Zazzal, M.K. Khraisheh and F.K. Abu-Farha: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 191 (2007) No. 1-3, p.189.

Google Scholar

[12] C.Y. Gao, P. Lours and G. Bernhart: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 169 (2005) No. 2, p.281.

Google Scholar

[13] S.G. Luckey, P.A. Friedman and K.J. Weinmann: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 209 (2009) No. 1-3, p.2152.

Google Scholar

[14] S.S. Jiang, K.F. Zhang, H.F. Wu, Y. Xu, K. Lei and B. Wang: Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, Vol. 42 (2010) No. 2, p.249. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar