A Bayesian Network Based Approach to Defect Prediction in New Product Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

The development of new product with low cost and reliable quality is one of important means to improve customer satisfaction and increase manufactures’ profits. It is necessary to identify the key factors affecting product defects and control them early in the new product development (NPD) process with defect prediction methods, because defect prediction can effectively avoid or lower testing and unnecessary rework costs. The author proposes a new product defect prediction approach on the basis of Bayesian Network theory for decision-making in the NPD process. The proposed approach makes use of Bayesian Network to simulate defects’ formation process, and it has a strong learning ability without requiring much data at the beginning of defect prediction. Product developers can easily predict the probability of defect occurrence of new products with this practical approach. The proposed product defect prediction approach can also help to focus on key factors influencing defects most. An example of turbine valve development is used to illustrate the proposed defect prediction approach. Also, recommendations for future research have been suggested.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 328-330)

Pages:

241-245

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pearl J: Graphical, Models for Probabilistic and Causal Reasoning (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands 1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Elsayed EA: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 38 (2000) No. 9, pp. (1953).

Google Scholar

[3] McLinn, James A: Proc. 45th Annual Quality Congress (Milwaukee, USA, May 20-22, 1991). Vol. 45, p.788.

Google Scholar

[4] Pilot, S.: Quality Progress, Vol. 35 (2002) No. 3, p.120.

Google Scholar

[5] Cotnareanu, T.: Old tools-new uses: Equipment FMEA, Quality Progress, Vol. 32 (1999) No. 12, p.48.

Google Scholar

[6] Schmidt, J.B., Calontone, R.J.: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 30 (2002) No. 2, p.103.

Google Scholar

[7] Yadav Om Prakash1, Singh Nanua1 and Goel Parveen S.: Quality Engineering, Vol. 15 (2003) No. 4, p.649.

Google Scholar

[8] M.W. Fu, M.S. Yong: International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 47 (2009) No. 18, p.5203.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Renooij and C. Wittemna: International Journal of approximate reasoning, Vol. 22 (1999) No. 3, p.169.

Google Scholar

[10] L.C. Van der Gaag, S. Renooij and C.L.M. Witteman.: Proc. The 15th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial intelligence (Stockholm, Sweden, 1999), p.647.

Google Scholar