Empirical Analysis of Performance of Public Organizations Based on DEA Model

Bin Wei; Wen Di Niu; Yu Luo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.953

Paper Titles

The Development of Embedded Rotating Machine Fault Diagnosis System Based on Qt/Embedded
p.933

The Find-Forming of Transmission Line in ANSYS
p.939

Based on Entropy Weight and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Ecological Benefits of the Project—Analysis on Cold-Formed Thin-Walled Steel Residential Structure
p.943

Analysis on Effects of Fuel Cam on High-Pressure Fuel System
p.948

Empirical Analysis of Performance of Public Organizations Based on DEA Model
p.953

Study on Advantage for Exploring Thin Sandwich by CPTU
p.957

Study on Figuring Technique on a Back-Strap Loom of Li Nationality
p.961

Studies on Curing Kinetics Parameter of TDI-PPG-MOCA Polyurethane by FTIR
p.966

Study on Complex Adaptive Features of Enterprise Network
p.970

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 328-330Empirical Analysis of Performance of Public...

Empirical Analysis of Performance of Public Organizations Based on DEA Model

Abstract:

Performance evaluation of public organizations is a problem we are facing at home and abroad. Objective and overall quantitative evaluation should be based on the interdisciplinary knowledge system basis, therefore, this article depends on public management theory, management science and engineering theory, statistics and so on, drawing Quantitative assessment experience from abroad, following the logic of evolution of quantitative assessment, based on combining theory with practice, empirical analysis and normative analysis, induction and education ,qualitative and quantitative analysis, to research the intrinsic logic of organization performance and explore the new system of quantitative evaluation . The paper first elaborates and explains quantitative analysis of organization performance, then, based on value orientation of public organizations and data envelopment analysis (DEA model), construct index system of government performance .On this basis, the paper mainly gives some more objective evaluation from the relationship between DEA effectiveness and government performance of some cities in Shandong province.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 328-330)

Pages:

953-956

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.328-330.953

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2011

Authors:

Bin Wei, Wen Di Niu, Yu Luo

Keywords:

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Government Performance, Quantitative Study, Service-Oriented Government

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Richard C. kearney, Evanm. Berman. Public Sector Performance: Management, Motivation, and Measurement Boulder[M]. Colorado: Westview Press, (1999).

DOI: 10.1177/0734371x0002000108

Google Scholar

[2] G.F. Peng. Based on the local government DEA model validity evaluation of public enterprises management [J]. China soft science, 2005, (8).

Google Scholar

[3] G。ang��. Li. The Yangtze river 16 delta comparative study of city government ability [J]. Management world, 2004, (8).

Google Scholar

[4] J.H. Yan. Based on the BP neural network performance evaluation of e-government [J]. china management science, 2005, (6).

Google Scholar

[5] T. Wang, J.N. Wu. National official assessment method of quantification evaluation [J]. Journal of economic management cadre institute of shaanxi province, 2004, (2).

Google Scholar

[6] Vivien Reid, Barbara Bardzki, Stephen McNamee. Communication and Culture: Designing a Knowledge-enabled Environment to Effect Local Government[J]. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 2004, (3).

Google Scholar

[7] Hendriks PHJ. Many rives to cross: from ICT to knowledge management systems[J]. The Journal of Information Technology, 2001, (16).

Google Scholar

[8] Goffee R, Jones G. What Holds the Modern Company Together? [J]. Harvard Business Review, (1996).

Google Scholar